ApolloHoax.net
Apollo Discussions => The Hoax Theory => Topic started by: DAKDAK on June 02, 2012, 10:33:44 PM
-
seagull
[Title restored by LunarOrbit]
-
Your apology might sound more sincere if you didn't YELL. So are you going to answer the pending questions in your other threads now?
-
[
-
How come you are always online?
Laurel's Total Time Online: 5 hours and 8 minutes (since February 08, 2012)
DAKDAK's Total Time Online: 9 hours and 22 minutes (since April 26, 2012)
In other words, you have spent almost twice as much time online as Laurel despite the fact that you joined the forum over two months after she did. So explain to me why you're questioning her amount of time online.
-
How come you are always online?
Laurel's Total Time Online: 5 hours and 8 minutes (since February 08, 2012)
DAKDAK's Total Time Online: 9 hours and 22 minutes (since April 26, 2012)
In other words, you have spent almost twice as much time online as Laurel despite the fact that you joined the forum over two months after she did. So explain to me why you're questioning her amount of time online.
That's what trolls do. Try to shift the focus off themselves.
-
OK. Very nice and all that. So when will you start defending your contention of a moon hoax? So what is with the "Fair use" Role?
-
[
-
[
-
DAKDAK, why don't you answer the many pending questions in your other threads instead of obsessing about how much time I spend online?
-
How come you are always online?
Laurel's Total Time Online: 5 hours and 8 minutes (since February 08, 2012)
DAKDAK's Total Time Online: 9 hours and 22 minutes (since April 26, 2012)
In other words, you have spent almost twice as much time online as Laurel despite the fact that you joined the forum over two months after she did. So explain to me why you're questioning her amount of time online.
I must have left it on-line and went to sleep. I dont get an alert when something is posted as you must judging by the speed of your responses and the short amount of time you spend on-line nothing personal just saying
Email is such a new-fangled concept isn't it?
-
Email is such a new-fangled concept isn't it?
Maybe his church only recently gave him permission to use it.
-
I don't have the "notify" option enabled here either. It's just that I tend to check back after I post things because I don't want people to think I'm a seagull.
-
OK. Very nice and all that. So when will you start defending your contention of a moon hoax? So what is with the "Fair use" Role?
I assumed that I would be attacked If I posted any substantial evidence questioning the Official Record so I put a fair use up to protect myself against copyright laws I am not by any means a expert on copyright or any other laws but I figured it couldn't hurt
Who do you think will attack you? Why do you think posting a video will protect you from attack?
-
I assumed that I would be attacked If I posted any substantial evidence questioning the Official Record
Actually, you would be applauded if you were to ever post any substantial evidence. We keep asking for it and you keep declining to produce any.
-
I assumed that I would be attacked If I posted any substantial evidence questioning the Official Record
Actually, you would be applauded if you were to ever post any substantial evidence.
Not to mention receiving a Pulitzer Prize, being named Time magazine Man of the Year, and the Nobel Committee inaugarating the DAKDAK Internet Investigative Award in his honor.
-
Please tell your BOSS to delete the post
Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon
-
Please tell your BOSS to delete the post
Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon
-
Please ask the moderator to delete
Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon
And any and all things posted by DAKDAK
Please ask the moderator too ban DAKDAK
-
Please ask the moderator to delete
Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon
And any and all things posted by DAKDAK
Please ask the moderator too ban DAKDAK
-
Please ask the moderator to delete
Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon
And any and all things posted by DAKDAK
Please ask the moderator too ban DAKDAK
For future reference, things like this are usually best done by private conversations with ample reasons given.
-
[
Yup, a single square bracket always confinces.
Really? thats all you have? a single square bracket?
-
[
Can we theorise that DAKDAK, having asked for his posts to be deleted, has now gone through his past posts and edited them to remove material. That's the calibre of the hoax theorists for you.
-
Fortunately, the quotes and responses give a good idea of what happened.
On the one hand, this would never have happened at BAUT because they would never have allowed him to last this long. On the other hand, we wouldn't have had anything.
The one good bit about not being able to reverse his vandalism is that it can now be seen by all what he tried to do.
-
The one good bit about not being able to reverse his vandalism is that it can now be seen by all what he tried to do.
Absolutely, and while slightly annoying, I think it is wonderful testament to the ludicrous 'movement' that he argues for. It is good vandalism.
-
The one good bit about not being able to reverse his vandalism is that it can now be seen by all what he tried to do.
Absolutely, and while slightly annoying, I think it is wonderful testament to the ludicrous 'movement' that he argues for. It is good vandalism.
If we give any of these guys enough time, they will reveal themselves for who they are. Readers of this forum will be not fooled into thinking DAKDAK had anything substantial to offer to the moon hoax debate and can judge the intent of his clumsy attempt to erase his presence here.
-
...
Can we theorise that DAKDAK, having asked for his posts to be deleted, has now gone through his past posts and edited them to remove material. That's the calibre of the hoax theorists for you.
Yes, he tried to go back and cover up his sorry record.
DAKDAK, you are a coward.
Fortunately, most of your ridiculous claims and bragging are captured in quoted form, and you will never be able to eradicate it. It's there for all the world to see - forever - and to point at and laugh, and now everyone will also know that you tried to hide it all.
-
If we give any of these guys enough time, they will reveal themselves for who they are. Readers of this forum will be not fooled into thinking DAKDAK had anything substantial to offer to the moon hoax debate and can judge the intent of his clumsy attempt to erase his presence here.
I think that is true of all moon hoax advocates. Give them enough rope and they hang themselves in the end. I can think of a few who have done more damage to their arguments than good. I have arrived at the conclusion that if you let them spout enough rubbish, then the weight of their own stupid defeats their own arguments, and they require no more countering. Take Ralph Rene's waving flags and C-rock. Those two theories alone destroy the moon hoax with their utter stupidity (at least in my humble opinion). The rest of Ralph's scientific theories undermine anything else he has to say on the subject. In fact, the way I feel, the day Ralph Rene joined the moon hoax brigade was the day the moon hoax theory was buried. When you have intellect like that on your side, you should realise it is time to throw the towel in, and not jump on the sinking ship.
-
Shirley there must be a way to restore all DD's modified posts? Or at least a way to lock someone's account when they modify x posts within x minutes? And/or put a time restriction, say 5 minutes, on modifying different posts? Maybe when someone has been clearly identified as an Apollo hoaxer their account can be changed to prohibit them from modifying posts older than 1 or 2 hours?
Anyway, the hypocrisy of DD censoring his own posts all the while claiming the mass media is censoring the hoaxers will escape DD's attention.
-
Shirley....
And don't call me Shirley!
-
Or does the forum software allow for a time limit for how long posts are editable? A few hours or a day would give people to correct stupid typos but prevent this kind of embarrassing nonsense.
-
It does - see here: http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=107.0
-
Boy, I've seen some conspiracy theorists go down in flames, but this was ridiculous.
Poor DAKDAK, I hope the guy gets some help, because, to be brutally honest, he needs it.
Alas, poor DAKDAK, I knew him, a man of infinite pest.
-
Shirley there must be a way to restore all DD's modified posts? Or at least a way to lock someone's account when they modify x posts within x minutes? And/or put a time restriction, say 5 minutes, on modifying different posts? Maybe when someone has been clearly identified as an Apollo hoaxer their account can be changed to prohibit them from modifying posts older than 1 or 2 hours?
Anyway, the hypocrisy of DD censoring his own posts all the while claiming the mass media is censoring the hoaxers will escape DD's attention.
Yup, there is.
From the SMF manual:
You set it in Admin > Forum > Posts and Topics> Post Settings
Maximum time after posting to allow edit? ____ minutes
OTOH, Dak's posts were quoted in many replies, so his duplicity is noted, as he cannot delete others posts.
Kudos to sts for reconstructing the OP.
-
Kudos to sts for reconstructing the OP.
By the way, DAKDAK's posts are still in Google's cache, which may be useful for recovery in some cases.
http://www.google.com/search?q=dakdak+site:apollohoax.net
-
Now if the effort of editing all those posts and thread titles had instead been put into effort, say, reading and learning and discussing ...
-
Now if the effort of editing all those posts and thread titles had instead been put into effort, say, reading and learning and discussing ...
Quite the paradox, no?
If he had, he wouldn't be posting to begin with.