Couldn`t you simultaneously add even more questions? How do you expect me to answer all of them? Or at least deal with them?
Oh, so you're crying foul because we didn't play nice and answer you one at a time? You, who are just throwing more and more crap at the wall with every post, refusing to acknowledge responses and deal with the answers and reasons you have been given?
I added the vid specifically to address the 10 minute and 11 second mark. And I mean specifically the rectangle anomaly in that picture. Nothing else, I didn`t need to know how bad or schizofrenic he is, or how you got tired after watching 3 minutes of the video. Just address the 10;11 mark, address the rectangle and colour dissonance along its lines. Simple as that.
I did. At least one other person did. Again, it is a JPEG compression artifact highlighted by messing around in photoshop. Does that rectangular feature show up on the original FILM with the picture on it?
Don`t call people names behind their back. If you want address hunchbacked, invite him here, or let him reason his refusal.
He has been on this board, or at least the previous incarnation of it, under a different name. He was banned for being rude and refusing to debate in a sensible fashion, being wilfully ignorant and utterly refusing to do even the simplest bit of research that might prove his ideas wrong. He has earned the treatment he gets from the long term posters here. Don't you come on and try to lecture us in manners.
If you were really educated people, or people dealing with science, you would ask me how did I design that helicopter, or what ideas did I put there, what innovations did I plan, or what else I have designed.
No we wouldn't, because that has NOTHING to do with what you are discussing here.
I f you were really scientists, and engineers, i would gladly see what have you built with your own hands.
I AM a scientist, by profession and qualification. We don't build things with our own hands, but I have spent almost seven years as part of a team designing and developing a novel blood testing device. When it goes to market I'll let you know.
And you could have asked me the same questions.
Why would we? You were asked about your qualifications.
Where are you space , and aviation engineers? come out, i will gladly discuss airframes anf future aircraft. Why don`t you use a chance?
They're already here. They are not discussing those subjects because that is not what this forum is for.
And you know for yourself that there are atronauts who have talked about how beatiful the stars were from space, and you know that this issue has been addressed by jarrah White and Unforgiven ( or similar, can`t remeber his name precisely).
Yes, and they, like you it seems, cannot grasp the simple fact that what you can see and what you can photograph are two very different things due to the different way your eye works compared to a camera.
You know , how NASA has added fire to the conspiracy by declaring no flyby zones,
Yeah, it's funny how they want to keep some airways free for their own tests rather than risk random private and commercial airliners flying into them isn't it?
how they have postponed and postponed the return to the moon, joggling from `irrelevant-been there done that, to let`s do it in 2050.
Irrelevant. What they are doing now with regard to the Moon does not invalidate what they did fifty years ago.
isn`t it amazing that those truly amazing science people were not even interested in having superb star pictures taken on the far side of the moon,
What would be so amazing about them?
While their 3rd guy was waiting in capsule in lunar orbit, noone of the 2 astronauts was even interested in trying to film or photograph it up there.
Do please feel free to tell us what an Apollo spacecraft at 69 miles altitude would loook like in a picture or video.
Want the paper work from Boeing about lunar rover, nope, sorry, we flushed it down the toilet.
There is plenty of paperwork about the lunar rover, you just have to go and actually look for it rather than expect them to be able to deliver every sheet of paper that was ever printed on the subject at your request.
Talking about the stars I dont mean that by any conditions they could photograph stars, I mean they had a lot of chances to adopt different lenses and exposure settings, and use very good circumstances, in shadows or behind huge boulders to make really wonderful pictures.
Again, what would be wonderful about pictures of the stars taken on the Moon compared to taken down here? What would be so significantly wonderful about it that they would devote time and effort to getting those images instead of studying the NEW UNTOUCHED LUNAR SURFACE AT THEIR FEET!!!
Personally I would really like to photograph satellites of jupiter in vacuum, had I been on the moon.
Look up your history. By the time Apollo landed on the Moon, the Voyager probes were in development. And AGAIN, what would be so spectacular about a picture of Jupiter taken from the moon compared to one taken from Earth?
I would be really interested in usinga FLIR camera as well.
What about a far UV camera? Isn't it weird they didn't take the opportunity to take the one type of picture of the stars that could not be taken from Earth? Oh, wait, THEY DID!
And I would definitely ask a question where is Westinghouse with their cutting edge videocameras today?
Do you think their 'cutting edge' video cameras had much application outside of the space program? They were poor cousins to the cameras that can be handled and used on Earth due to the limitations on their size, weight and bandwidth that were not a constraint to normal TV cameras. Westinghouse cameras were used in space for a long time.
Were you really gentlemen, you wouldn`t even allow me to be cornered by so many of you at the same time.
When addressing me, try to imagine , I am a human, not an indicted person in trial.
Were you a gentleman you would conduct yourself in a more mature manner. You raised issues, you were responded to, and instead of dealing with them you just throw out rubbish like this.
You also claimed to be something you are not, by doing the standard 'I'm neutral' approach so favoured by conspiracy theorists. The treatment you receive here, as on any board, is very strongly related to the way you act yourself.
