ApolloHoax.net

Apollo Discussions => The Reality of Apollo => Topic started by: BertieSlack on October 04, 2017, 01:25:46 AM

Title: Saturn V - quick question about performance
Post by: BertieSlack on October 04, 2017, 01:25:46 AM
When someone claims that the Saturn V wasn't powerful enough to do what we all saw it do, I usually ask them how they think Skylab got into orbit. Does anyone know, in terms of lifting capability, which is more impressive:

- putting a moon-capable SIV-B with CSM and LM into a parking orbit of 100 miles altitude
- putting Skylab into an orbit more than twice as high as the Apollo parking altitude without a third stage burn

I've seen Bob Brauenig's excellent Saturn V launch simulation relating to the Apollo 11 mission, but can anyone do a quick comparison of the two scenarios?
Title: Re: Saturn V - quick question about performance
Post by: bknight on October 04, 2017, 09:11:05 AM
I'm not sure if this is what you are seeking but:
Skylab-  195300 lb (88600 kg) at vel ~7.77 km/s
Apollo stack-  247000lb (112000 kg) at vel 7.8 km/s

Skylab - ~2.67 10^6 J
Apollo - ~3.4 10^6 J

So I would say that Apollo KE was slightly higher than Skylab.