No you are not close at all. I need no impetus to make remarks. They just happen.
I didn't say you were looking for an impetus. I said you were looking for a justification. I have no doubt you'll keep making categorical
ad hominem remarks. Your efforts to socially engineer your way past the debate -- which certainly have not gone unnoticed -- would fare better if you could rely on something stronger than assumption for their basis. You wouldn't be the first to try to use belief in conspiracy theories as a proxy for open-mindedness. You have no problem accusing everyone here of having a closed mind. You've already done it several times. But those accusations would work better for you for avoiding real debate if you could point to data supplied by other people that seemed to support them.
I am one of those kind of people that likes to put everything in its place. I place people into categories and deal with them according to their placement. It is highly efficient.
Yeah, that would be the categorical
ad hominem arguments I mentioned. It's disappointing that you think that's how adults should manage a discussion.
No, I won't be answering your question. You'll have to continue assuming without evidence that everyone is ideologically set against you, rather than their just pointing out that you're factually wrong.