I basically redid Bob's calculations from a couple of posts earlier. Thought it would be better to effectively spam the threads with the calculations he says don't exist.
Yeah, this "no one has answered my question" nonsense is getting really old. One of the reason I quoted my post from here was to show that not only has his question been answered, but that is was answered weeks ago.
I've also tried to re-frame the issue with my question in posts #119 and #154. My question is just a straightforward physics problem involving force, mass and time. I'm trying to find out what points Heiwa agrees with and what points he doesn't. If he'll agree that the thrust and duration was adequate to produce the change in velocity, then the question becomes "can a mass flow rate of 30.5 kg/s produce a thrust of 94,000 N?" Although I'm sure he won't be any less pigheaded, at least it might allow the discussion to advance in a different direction than continuing to debate his flawed energy-balance method (since that's going nowhere).