Author Topic: I don’t know if man went to the moon in the sixties  (Read 112994 times)

Offline JayUtah

  • Neptune
  • ****
  • Posts: 3791
    • Clavius
Re: I don’t know if man went to the moon in the sixties
« Reply #165 on: June 04, 2012, 07:02:28 PM »
He is my hand wrtten argument color coded

Practically none of it is factually correct.  For someone who claims he has studied Apollo 11 thoroughly, you haven't managed to get anything right.  Go back and try again.

Quote
Below find a link to a 27 minute movie filmed before opening the hatch to the Lunar Module showing the three astronauts without there spacesuits helmets boots backpacks on

They didn't wear backpacks in the command module.  They didn't wear the lunar surface gear in the command module.  Only the pressure garment and integrated insulation garment would ever have been worn in the command module, and then only under contingency flight-plan rules that applied in the unlikely event of total cabin depressurization.

You didn't do your homework.  But of course, you haven't done any homework since before 9th grade, and it shows.

Quote
This could not possibly have been filmed in the small cramped CM named columbia

Begging the question.  Argument rejected.
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams

Offline gillianren

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 2211
    • My Letterboxd journal
Re: I don’t know if man went to the moon in the sixties
« Reply #166 on: June 04, 2012, 08:17:39 PM »
Could it have fit in a small cramped CM named something else?
"This sounds like a job for Bipolar Bear . . . but I just can't seem to get out of bed!"

"Conspiracy theories are an irresistible labour-saving device in the face of complexity."  --Henry Louis Gates

Offline Echnaton

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1490
Re: I don’t know if man went to the moon in the sixties
« Reply #167 on: June 04, 2012, 09:19:23 PM »
Could it have fit in a small cramped CM named something else?
LOL
The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new. —Samuel Beckett

Offline DAKDAK

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 60
  • BANNED
Re:
« Reply #168 on: June 05, 2012, 01:09:34 AM »

Offline DAKDAK

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 60
  • BANNED
Re: I
« Reply #169 on: June 05, 2012, 03:12:03 AM »
Please ask the moderator to delete

Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon 

And any and all things posted by DAKDAK

Please ask the moderator too ban DAKDAK

Offline DAKDAK

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 60
  • BANNED
Re: I
« Reply #170 on: June 05, 2012, 03:14:07 AM »
Please ask the moderator to delete

Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon 

And any and all things posted by DAKDAK

Please ask the moderator too ban DAKDAK

Offline DAKDAK

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 60
  • BANNED
Re: I
« Reply #171 on: June 05, 2012, 03:15:24 AM »
Please ask the moderator to delete

Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon 

And any and all things posted by DAKDAK

Please ask the moderator too ban DAKDAK

Offline DAKDAK

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 60
  • BANNED
Re: I
« Reply #172 on: June 05, 2012, 03:17:35 AM »
Please ask the moderator to delete

Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon 

And any and all things posted by DAKDAK

Please ask the moderator too ban DAKDAK

Offline DAKDAK

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 60
  • BANNED
Re: I
« Reply #173 on: June 05, 2012, 03:18:36 AM »
Please ask the moderator to delete

Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon 

And any and all things posted by DAKDAK

Please ask the moderator too ban DAKDAK

Offline Abaddon

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1132
Re: I
« Reply #174 on: June 05, 2012, 07:07:30 AM »
Please ask the moderator to delete

Topic: Videos of the vehicle that took (supposedly) took Apollo 11 to the moon 

And any and all things posted by DAKDAK

Please ask the moderator too ban DAKDAK

No, I consider it far more informative to leave your ignorance on display for all to see.

Offline Echnaton

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1490
Re: I
« Reply #175 on: June 05, 2012, 07:51:02 AM »
Speaking to DakDak at the start of this tread

Otherwise you will have nothing better to support your position that personal incredulity.  Is that what you really want to stand on?

Personal incredulity was ultimately all he had to stand on and when he realized the gravity of his mistake he saw no option but to try and cover it up by deleting his posts.  Perhaps he learned something along the way.
The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new. —Samuel Beckett

Offline sts60

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 402
I don't know if man went to the moon in the sixties
« Reply #176 on: June 05, 2012, 02:36:54 PM »
Here is DAKDAK's original post as titled in this thread.  I just lifted this from BazBear's quote on the first page.
******

I don't know if man went to the moon in the sixties or not, but the record of the Apollo missions seems to be completely false

Here are some of the reasons I believe this
1.   The Command Module being only 210 cubic feet would not fit (3) men all the food, water, air, spacesuits, boots, helmets, cameras film and equipment needed for up to 10-11 days in space. The usual reply is that these items were in the Lem or the service module, but that would be very unsafe (not to mention bringing back hundreds of pounds of moon rocks)
2.   Back in the Apollo days we (the public) were told that the Moon was an Extremely Hot, Dry, and geologically dead place with no atmosphere. Now according to the NASA Lunar Science Institute the moon is an extremely Cold, Wet geologically active place with an atmosphere that extends all the way to earth. Just the opposite of what we were told.
3.   The trajectory of the Apollo missions is nothing like spacecraft go to the moon today. Today spacecraft going to the moon make several increasingly large earth orbits not a crazy “8” trajectory.
4.   Regardless of popular belief computer and communication technology were not sufficient in the sixties (slide rules were  the norm in the sixties)
5.   Several of the Apollo mission especially AP17 supposedly went to the moon when the moon was nearly full. If the moon puts out enough light that I can easily see the settings on my telescope and camera in Florida, over 200 thousand miles away don't you think that the light would blind the astronauts if they were actually on the moon
6.   Several people note that the lighting wasn't right in the lunar pictures and that they did not bring any lights with them Why not? It would take at least 3 additional cameramen to take all the lunar footage not Ed Fendell from Houston with a remote control
7.   Since the spacesuits were supposedly cooled by water the astronaut's would have instantly frozen on Eva's and on the surface of the moon in the shade
8.   The  Lem was made of Tin foil, Mylar and tape the abort procedure was to bail out in space
9.   Any glass in the command module would melt upon reentry killing anyone inside
10.   There is no way the record of the Apollo missions is accurate.

Offline Captain Swoop

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 31
Re: I don’t know if man went to the moon in the sixties
« Reply #177 on: June 06, 2012, 09:04:48 AM »
Is it possible to restore everything he redacted?

Offline LunarOrbit

  • Administrator
  • Saturn
  • *****
  • Posts: 1052
    • ApolloHoax.net
Re: I don’t know if man went to the moon in the sixties
« Reply #178 on: June 06, 2012, 09:32:07 AM »
It looks like his posts are still in Googles cache so I'm going to try to copy & paste them when I get home work tonight.
It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth.
I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth.
I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- Neil Armstrong (1930-2012)

Offline Echnaton

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1490
Re: I don’t know if man went to the moon in the sixties
« Reply #179 on: June 06, 2012, 02:04:32 PM »
I may have his pdf rant in my download folder.  I'll post it later if someone else doesn't
The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new. —Samuel Beckett