Apollo Discussions > The Hoax Theory
Conclusive Proof the Moon Landings were Faked
najak:
--- Quote from: Mag40 on January 07, 2025, 03:51:35 PM ---It's cool to admit errors, we all make them, but come on! It's not just that is it! You're blundering into the science of rocketry and arguing with an acknowledged industry expert. You're making statements about the LM flight capabilities from a position of obvious ignorance.
--- End quote ---
I came here for the correction, scrutiny, and learning. The revelation with "Lunar Launch too Fast" was humbling. I was very certain of this one when I started. I'm VERY GLAD to have been corrected.
There are some things, like the 8-flag-motions that are SIMPLE CONTEXT -- no rocket science. There are other reasons for my current MLH belief, which are also NOT rocket science.
My bias tells me they are strong arguments, but my experience says to not trust them too much unless they've been scrutinized. I find little scrutiny within the MLH echo chambers... as the whole mindset within that chamber is biased towards believing things that support MLH. Likewise, the same effect is going on here. And Likewise -- BOTH groups think they are the TD's and the others are defending a Lie.
So bringing the groups together is a good thing.
Mag40:
--- Quote from: najak on January 07, 2025, 04:17:57 PM ---So bringing the groups together is a good thing.
--- End quote ---
Nope. I refer you to the highly accurate and relevant signature of Jason Thompson:
"There's this idea that everyone's opinion is equally valid. My arse! Bloke who was a professor of dentistry for forty years does NOT have a debate with some eejit who removes his teeth with string and a door!" - Dara O'Briain
Luke Pemberton:
Very magnanimous najak, and refreshing. The debate here can be vociferous but this is refreshing for once.
Zakalwe:
--- Quote from: najak on January 07, 2025, 03:39:20 PM ---
Admittedly, my base understanding of the concept of "balancing on a center column of thrust" appears wrong. I would expect the physics simulation to confirm this concept.
Thank you again.
--- End quote ---
And it only took a mere 46 pages! See what I mean when I called you a slow learner?
BertieSlack:
--- Quote from: JayUtah on January 07, 2025, 10:16:14 AM ---They reprogrammed the AGC to work as a fly-by-wire system for a military jet.
--- End quote ---
I gave najak a clue about that further up the thread but he seems to have missed it.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version