In other words your post was psychobabble with the sole intent of personally deriding and attacking my character and integrity while actually having no idea or concern of the validity of my position or my competence in arriving at my conclusions.
For someone that has expressed sexist and racist views you are on thin ice accusing others of attacking characters when you slur whole groups of people based on nothing more than gender and skin colour. Further, you're not immune from attacking characters yourself are you? I offered you a gentle barb and your retort was to call me a cretin. I suggest that you grow a thicker skin as the people here have done nothing more than gently rib you.
You seem quite sensitive to having your ego damaged, that is very telling given your position. It's a trait of CTs that I have observed. Finally, I have read and followed Echnanton for several years now, and you really are picking a fight with the wrong person. If anything, Echnanton is one of more balanced voices at this forum and has on occasion been swift to remind other members about the boundaries of decorum. Echnanton lives the other side of the world to me and thus I have never met him in person, but I would consider him someone that I would share dinner with. He is a gentleman and thought of highly at this forum for his genteel manner and considered philosophical approach to all subjects. He is also delightfully funny and has a razor wit, so if you can't stand the heat, you know where to find the door.
It all you folks do here on these trap and whack NASA propaganda forums.
LO runs the site out of good grace. He could stop running it tomorrow if he wishes. He is in no way connected to NASA. I'm not quite sure how we trapped you, you arrived here under your own steam. You knew the welcome you would get, so quit moaning or get out of the kitchen.
Why do you think I posted here in the first place if it were not to prove you have no interest in approaching the question of the Apollo saga in a scientific manner devoid of these personal attacks and these non-intellectual ego driven displays of defective personality traits and mental abnormalities.
You've proved nothing other than your self-aggrandising manner. You declared superior intelligence to every member of this board and then could not answer basic questions on x-ray energies and flux. You demanded TLI data, which you claimed NASA had not published, and when given several sources of data you showed no grace in admitting that it was you who was wrong. Then you have the effrontery to claim that people attack you? It's a bit like being in Louvre and demanding to see the Mona Lisa, claiming that it is faked when all along you are standing right in front of it and then not apologising to paying members of the gallery for making a scene.
If you come to this forum making such demands what did you expect? People here to say 'Oh, he's got us there, NASA didn't publish the TLI data, whoops!' I'll give you a clue, they aren't going to say that my pedigree chum. What they are going to do is give you a link to the data because... that's right, they know Apollo like the Queen knows how much gold is in the Bank of England vaults. There are people here that know every part of Apollo, down to the torque settings applied to the wingly-floppety-wangle nuts in the flubber-injector-flange.
You're all living in some sort of alternate reality where you don't realize how socially isolated ,obnoxious and WRONG you are about a wide variety of things.
Says you.
The Apollo hoax is the focus of your attention because it is your job, and you are given this job because you have all of the qualifications, a disregard for truth, a personal interest in promulgating the hoax and personalities that allow you to lash out and attack people not because they are wrong, but because they are right.
Prove it is my job. Show evidence that NASA had made payments to me. Where is that evidence? For someone that is so demanding of proof and sets the bar high for others, you sure do throw bare assertions around.
I wonder do you ever think about the possibility that these methods that are calculated to be psychologically damaging may actually be destroying people who are not mentally strong simply because they see a truth you are hired to cover up?
I thought you said psychology was a pseudoscience (credit to Andromeda for that spot - but then she is a woman so I guess that would be a problem for you Romulus? Maybe she hasn't got the brain to spot your inconsistencies eh?)
I know that psychology is a pseudoscience that is based entirely on opinions that have no basis of reality
Sure, some of them are whacked out loons with crazy ideas (and trust me, you have some whacked out loons on your side of the debate!), but even a whacked out loon can see the truth sometimes and with NASA and it's many outrageous claims, it tends to bring out the worst in everyone including you
Can I remove my foil hat now please?