Recent Posts

1

General Discussion / Re: The Trump Presidency

« Last post by Peter B on Today at 06:01:34 PM »

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-31/donald-trump-hush-money-trial-verdict/103910472

Donald Trump has been found guilty of falsifying business records, a felony that could result in prison time.

Well. I suppose he'll appeal...

2

The Hoax Theory / Re: Our favourite "Dr" turned up in a debate recently

« Last post by Bryanpoprobson on Today at 04:17:40 PM »

MCTOON is doing a follow up debate in July, with Marcus “yes they did, oh wait no they didn’t land on the Moon” Allen. Does anybody have any links to specific ballistic tests carried out on the AL7 suits? As this is one of his question he will face. I can find references to ballistic tests but no actual documentation or images.

3

The Hoax Theory / Re: Our favourite "Dr" turned up in a debate recently

« Last post by TimberWolfAu on Today at 12:58:16 PM »

'Not a Dr' Rasa has turned up for another debate, with McToon this time. Toon has done his homework on Rasa. Amusingly, Rasa posted this in The Moon-Landing Hoax FB page before the debate, but hasn't bumped the post back to the top or even commented since the debate happened, just quietly letting it sink.

4

The Hoax Theory / Re: New interview: Joe Rogan and Bart Sibrel

« Last post by Donnie B. on May 29, 2024, 04:44:07 PM »

For those interested, Dave McKeegan has done a nice rebuttal YouTube video to the Sibrel-Rogan interview.  He does his usual excellent job, though it's infuriating to see Sibrel's despicable accusations about AS-204 again (grrr).

5

The Reality of Apollo / Re: Apollo 11 and 17 imaged by South Korea

« Last post by onebigmonkey on May 28, 2024, 04:11:26 AM »

The shadowcam now has images of more of the Apollo sites.

Apollo 11 and 12 don't disturb the ground enough, but 14 and 16 did. Here's a dark blob at the LM site for Apollo 14:



And here's the LM and LRV at its VIP spot for Apollo 16

6

The Reality of Apollo / Re: "Star" in an Apollo photo?

« Last post by Zakalwe on May 21, 2024, 03:57:36 AM »

No expert here, but the two images are taken from different vantage points, the second of which would seem to occlude the "object".

I'm more inclined to think that it is an artefact (cosmic ray strike?).

7

The Reality of Apollo / Re: "Star" in an Apollo photo?

« Last post by jfb on May 20, 2024, 02:47:57 PM »

Couldn't be the CSM passing overhead, could it?

Otherwise I'd go with an artifact in development or scanning (or damage to the film itself).  On the full-size scan I see a few more spots that look like that, just much smaller/fainter. 

8

The Reality of Apollo / Re: "Star" in an Apollo photo?

« Last post by Mag40 on May 19, 2024, 05:09:14 AM »

Search on "venus" on Gonetoplaid's images page:
https://www.mem-tek.com/apollo/ISD.html

9

The Reality of Apollo / Re: "Star" in an Apollo photo?

« Last post by raven on May 19, 2024, 12:13:01 AM »

Though not a star, Venus is captured in a couple photos, such as AS14-64-9191. Quite hard to see though.

10

The Reality of Apollo / Re: "Star" in an Apollo photo?

« Last post by bknight on May 18, 2024, 12:10:31 PM »

Well if you look at AS17-146-22294 there is no object, so I'm going out on a limb here: it is a film artifact.

ETA:  The second image appears taken from a slightly different perspective and this ay attribute to the object going behind the bolder possibly