What the hell does Patriot missile success rate got to do with Lunar Orbital Rendezvous? You haven't got a single clue what is involved or how it was achieved. As for being an engineer, every post you make just confirms you are not. That sort of superficial equivalance argument might be used by a lawyer but NO engineer argues this way. There are no lies in science and engineering. If what you say is true, it will be demonstratably true.
Now if you show up and say X isn't possible and we actually understand how X was achieved, we naturally expect you to explain why. By this method we can discover whether our understanding is faulty or yours. When it turns out you actually don't know how X was claimed to have been achieved in the first place and then merely state something was impossible without explaining or demonstrating why, completely undermines you. However, we can subject every claim made for the Apollo program to the same demands and guess what? It all checks out. Waving your hands around and repeating unsupported assertions is the equivalent of banging your fists on the floor and yelling 'I'm right, I'm right, I'm right'.
Impersonating an engineer is more difficult than you thought.