Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Remastering also brings in color gamut issues and resolution issues. Most television at the time was shot on 35 mm film. You have to make different color correction and contrast correction choices when remastering for modern televisions. The "red" command uniforms in Star Trek: The Next Generation are actually fuchsia. All the processing decisions made during shooting and video transfer back then were made with certain assumptions in mind.

You can obtain quite a bit of resolution from 35 mm film, but when planning for 480p broadcast, the film appropriately captures more resolution than you want or need. Set designers and builders in the pre-HDTV era had a very good eye for what would pass. When you actually visit these sets you can see how frankly crudely a lot of it is built. And this is important when sticking to schedule and budget. I talked to a few of the original TNG set and prop designers who were a little embarrassed to see all their shortcuts revealed in glorious 1080i.

As I said above, our documentary was shot using FTETTM space suits, but on video instead of 35 mm film. Now I really want to see what the 35 mm original footage looks like. We had the original suit fabricator on set, from Global Effects. He showed me the shortcuts such as silver nylon fabric used instead of Chromel-R ($1,300 per yard). I have access to an A7L suit (with the original Chromel-R), so maybe one of my projects can be to compare the photography under different conditions and see how close they got.

If anyone wants to rent an A7L replica used on the series, here's the link.
https://newsite.globaleffects.com/GEI_Site/C_b03_frameset.html
2
I'm a little mad that they reformatted it to 16:9; all the shots were composed for a 4:3 screen, and some really important stuff (like the stuck thruster on Gemini 8) winds up off screen in the remaster.

It bugs the hell out of me when things get remastered into a different aspect ratio. Even I, a non-expert in the field of TV and film, can fathom that shots and scenes would have been blocked for the intended aspect ratio of presentation (that's why people in many TV shows often stand unnaturally close to each other when conversing: the 4:3 ratio needs them to do that to get them both in shot together in anything but a wide shot!). Therefore, if you make it widescreen by trimming the top and bottom you lose stuff, and if you extend to the sides you get stuff on screen that was never supposed to be. The fact that stuff actually gets released after such alteration boggles my mind, because of the number of people the product must have got past who thought 'yeah, that's fine'. And so we have things like the missing thruster you describe, or the infamous Buffy and Angel releases that are full of crew and production hardware, or actors awaiting their cue to enter, on the extended screen width. Sheer infuriating idiocy, and frankly I find it disrespectful to the original creative team.
3
I absolutely love this series. There's a fair bit of dramatic licence, of course, but when condensing events that took place over days, months or years into a series of 1-hour episodes that's unavoidable. A completely faithful adaptation would, most likely, be unutterably dull!

I love the attention to detail and the work put in to replicating the hardware (which makes things like the Saturn V footage that found its way into the Apollo 7 episode all the more baffling!), and that they tried to find ways to make the series much more than just a cataloguing of the missions. The drama, humour and raw emotion they got into it makes for a great and rewarding viewing experience.

Somewhat ironically, the episode I found least enjoyable was the Apollo 13 episode, but since they had not long done Apollo 13 as a movie they had to find a different angle for it. I don't think it's bad, it just doesn't hold my attention so much.
4
Other Conspiracy Theories / Re: HBO Miniseries From the Earth to the Moon
« Last post by jfb on April 23, 2025, 05:07:56 PM »
Watched it during its initial run and half a dozen times since.  I can't speak to the veracity of all the scenes; like the movie "Apollo 13" some dramatic license is taken in a number of places, but I don't think anything's wildly inaccurate.   

I'm a little mad that they reformatted it to 16:9; all the shots were composed for a 4:3 screen, and some really important stuff (like the stuck thruster on Gemini 8) winds up off screen in the remaster. 

But otherwise, it's amazing.  "That's All There Is" (Apollo 12) is probably the high point of the series, followed closely by "Spider" (Apollo 9) and "The Original Wives Club" (multiple).   
5
The Reality of Apollo / Apollo 13 doco on YT
« Last post by Peter B on April 22, 2025, 12:28:56 AM »


Just found this 2 hour video. It's an excellent piece of animation and explanation of Apollo 13, the mission, the accident, the recovery and the cause. I learned several things about the accident that I hadn't previously been aware of.

Highly recommended!
6
General Discussion / Radiation and Absorbed doses; further reading?
« Last post by TimberWolfAu on April 21, 2025, 12:40:29 AM »
Hi Folks,

I'm finding myself with no course to study at the moment, so, where is a good place to start for further understanding of radiation and absorbed doses? Along the lines of calculating, impacts of different materials etc

Figured I have the time, so I might as well deepen my understanding.
7
General Discussion / Re: NASA is lying for Trump
« Last post by Obviousman on April 07, 2025, 07:31:30 PM »
Sort-of related, there's a new video from Ellie In Space which goes into detail about just how bad things were on the Starliner as they approached the ISS, certainly far worse than I understood at the time.

I saw that - very good. I was able to understand!
8
General Discussion / Re: Kids say the darnedest things...
« Last post by Peter B on April 07, 2025, 06:55:14 AM »
I was impressed that my kids, 17YOS, 14YOS and 12YOD managed to keep up an indoor game of hide-and-seek for nearly half an hour on Sunday, and I said so to them.

12YOD: It only continued that long because I'm really good at the game.

14YOS: No, it's only because I'm really bad at the game.
9
The Reality of Apollo / Re: Chandrayaan-2 views Apollo
« Last post by bknight on April 05, 2025, 12:29:26 PM »
BZ?

BZ = Bravo Zulu = Naval terminology / signal flags for "Well Done!"
Well I was a ground pounder so the term was unknown, thanks.
10
General Discussion / Re: The Trump Presidency
« Last post by raven on April 05, 2025, 02:20:30 AM »
What was your first clue?
And we got another nearly four years of this circus, even if, IF, there's a peaceful transition of power.
Given his track record (Be wary, be wary of the 6th of January, of losers and MAGA and plot. I know of no reason why Capitol treason should ever be forgot) and repeatedly stated intentions to seek a third term, I definitely would not count on it.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10