Apollo Discussions > The Hoax Theory
New forum by najak
onebigmonkey:
Najak, late of this parish, has started his own forum to discuss Apollo matters.
The only thing there at the moment is an Apollo 13 post, where he concludes that a lack of evidence covering Apollo 13's re-entry means it is somehow fake.
https://apollogy.discoursehosting.net/categories
TimberWolfAu:
Beat me to it.
I'm in 'Rasa's' Facebook group, so I saw the post. I was going to wait a bit to see if it got any footing before posting here, didn't want to give the impression his site was being picked on I guess.
One thing I don't get, he keeps going on about how he wants to present all this to engineers, to show them how Apollo was fake, but the docs that he builds are so..... unprofessional and scattered that there is no way anyone would take more than a glance at them and decide it's not worth their time.
smartcooky:
--- Quote from: TimberWolfAu on July 25, 2025, 01:44:19 AM ---Beat me to it.
I'm in 'Rasa's' Facebook group, so I saw the post. I was going to wait a bit to see if it got any footing before posting here, didn't want to give the impression his site was being picked on I guess.
One thing I don't get, he keeps going on about how he wants to present all this to engineers, to show them how Apollo was fake, but the docs that he builds are so..... unprofessional and scattered that there is no way anyone would take more than a glance at them and decide it's not worth their time.
--- End quote ---
In order to present documentation to engineers for appraisal, you at least need to have some engineering nous, or preferably, have passed some engineering qualification yourself, so that you understand the language, the terms, the mathematics and the form. Najak has none of this, nor any credibility, and won't be taken seriously. The result is, he won't get any serious responses (at least none that will tell him what he wants to hear) so he will call it a closing of ranks and a cover up.
Ranb:
So far some of the math on the site to support their claims is completely wrong.
https://apollogy.discoursehosting.net/t/apollo-13-splashdown-on-target/16/14
bknight:
--- Quote from: smartcooky on July 25, 2025, 04:33:08 PM ---
--- Quote from: TimberWolfAu on July 25, 2025, 01:44:19 AM ---Beat me to it.
I'm in 'Rasa's' Facebook group, so I saw the post. I was going to wait a bit to see if it got any footing before posting here, didn't want to give the impression his site was being picked on I guess.
One thing I don't get, he keeps going on about how he wants to present all this to engineers, to show them how Apollo was fake, but the docs that he builds are so..... unprofessional and scattered that there is no way anyone would take more than a glance at them and decide it's not worth their time.
--- End quote ---
In order to present documentation to engineers for appraisal, you at least need to have some engineering nous, or preferably, have passed some engineering qualification yourself, so that you understand the language, the terms, the mathematics and the form. Najak has none of this, nor any credibility, and won't be taken seriously. The result is, he won't get any serious responses (at least none that will tell him what he wants to hear) so he will call it a closing of ranks and a cover up.
--- End quote ---
Well I remember him Gish Galloping along on too many threads and couldn't keep up the barrage of comments. The engineers here attempted to provide engineering explanations that were merely hand waved away so any discussion on his forum should be met with the same hand waving BS shown here. I don't do FB so anything posted there will be missed by me, luckily.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version