It is probably because each of the little tick marks are equidistantly spaced and not logarithmically spaced.
And we've been over this too. Tick marks that represent orders of magnitude (10, 100, 1000, ...)
must be equally spaced in a logarithmic scale. The minor gradations within them -- those representing linear multiples of values -- are the ones that end up logarithmically spaced in a logarithmic scale, and are frequently omitted for clarity. When they are omitted, referring to the order-of-magnitude tick
labels is what confirms the scale is logarithmic.
You cannot bluff your way past this, Tim. For those of us who pursued scientific careers, this is literally something we learned in our mid-teens and have used daily for decades. You're trying to parlay your personal confusion over how to read a logarithmic scale as something you can gaslight your way around.