Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
41
General Discussion / Re: The Trump Presidency
« Last post by Peter B on May 03, 2025, 10:53:10 AM »
I wonder whether Trump is the sort of guy who'd take credit for something he's no doubt partly responsible for, but mightn't actually like? In this case, he can take part credit for the Labor Party here in Oz gaining an increased majority and our conservative Coalition parties crashing to their worst result in decades.

1. Quick primer on the nuances of Aussie democracy.

We have a House of Representatives with 151 single-member seats, where the government is formed. Voting is preferential (not FPTP), so a candidate in second place on primary votes can overtake the first place candidate by gaining the preference votes of the less popular candidates.

We have a Senate with 76 seats, 12 for each state and 2 for each territory. Half of the state-based senators are up for election each time, while all the territory-based senators face election each time. Voting is a form of proportional representation, meaning that one or two seats from each state are often taken by minor parties or independents.

This combination of voting systems means that the Australian Parliament provides opportunities for voters to elect candidates who support policy platforms that differ from those of the major parties.

Voting is compulsory, the majority of polling places are primary schools, most schools take advantage of their captive audiences to run fund raising sausage sizzles, and so we all buy democracy sausages.

2. Parties

The Australian Labor Party (ALP) is a centre-left party. Its leader is the Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, who led the party to a very narrow victory in the 2022 election. As a party of the workers, its colour is red (take note, Yanks!).

The Coalition is a grouping of two conservative parties. The Liberal Party is a party of the centre-right to the right (that is, a party of Classical Liberalism and Free Enterprise). Its leader is Peter Dutton, who is very much of the right wing of the party, and often caricatured as Darth Dutton. Its colour is blue. The National Party is the party of rural Australia; while notionally conservative, farmers never say no to government subsidies.

The Greens are exactly as you'd expect them, to the left of the ALP. They poll about the same as the Nationals but win fewer seats than them as their support is widely and thinly spread.

Pauline Hanson's One Nation is a minor party to the right of the Liberals. It appeals to the same sort of people that Trump appeals to in the USA.

Trumpet of Patriots is a minor party led by businessman Clive Palmer. Palmer had one term in Parliament about a decade ago. He then created the United Australia Party and spent a heap of money in political ads, for a result of zero seats in the 2019 election and one seat in 2022. When the UAP was de-registered, he instead took over TOP. TOP was marketed as a very Trumpian-style party, with Palmer having some definitely Trumpish characteristics such as his litigiousness and his occasional business failures.

3. The Teals

A growing feature of Australian politics has been the Teals. As you might guess from their colour, these are candidates calling for action on climate change, but from the conservative side of politics. At the 2022 election they dragged a swathe of votes from the Liberals and took about six seats in the House of Representatives.

Even more remarkably, in 2022 a Teal won one of the two Senate seats here in the ACT. Since the ACT gained Senate representation in the 1970s, the two seats have been split between the ALP and the Liberals. But in 2022 a Teal beat the Liberals for the second Senate seat.

The result was that while the ALP claimed only a small majority in 2022, the Coalition was a very distant second.

4. The election campaign

Not surprisingly, the major parties ran a bunch of negative ads, although the ALP did a fair bit to remind people of what they have achieved in the last three years. By contrast, the Liberals couldn't decide what they wanted. Policies would be announced one day and then walked back a few days later when they turned out wildly unpopular or impractical, and Dutton himself was often drawn to his own Trumpian dark side.

TOP invited that charming USAnian Putin apologist Mothertucker Carlson to Australia a few months ago, to allow him to gush about Palmer the way he does about Trump and Putin. Their political ads were as frequent as ads by the major parties, and they attacked everyone, even their Pauline Hanson fellow travellers. When I checked out their website, they actually had a couple of half-decent policy ideas, but you'd never have known that if you relied on their advertising as they never mentioned their own policies.

The Greens were invisible. I don't remember seeing a single ad for them.

Here in my electorate, held by a fairly anonymous ALP drone, we had a high-profile campaign by a Teal.

5. The result

The short of it - the ALP has gained about 10 seats and the Coalition has lost about 10 seats. This makes Anthony Albanese the first person to win successive elections since 2004, which says something about how politically unsettled Australia has been in the last two decades. One of the Coalition losers was Opposition Leader Peter Dutton - the first time an Opposition Leader has lost his seat.

The other Coalition loser was the Coalition itself. They consciously presented themselves as parties of the right, rather than shifting towards the centre to try to win back Teal voters, and ended up losing votes on the right anyway, mostly to Pauline Hanson.

The Greens also lost votes. Over the last Parliament they had the opportunity to help the ALP emplace some decent progressive policies. Instead they joined the Coalition to block these policies in the Senate, because they weren't progressive enough. It was a stupid display of ideological purity, all the more stupid because it's not the first time they've done this sort of thing, and the voters seem to have remembered.

My seat? It's too early to be sure, but our Teal candidate looks like she's won. And as a Teal voter I have to say I'm pretty happy with that result.

And TOP? After all that advertising, they got about 2% of the vote. It would seem their trumpets were modelled on Monty Python trumpets.

I wonder if Mothertucker Carlson will have anything to say about his involvement with TOP, or if Trump and his "advisors" will learn anything. At the very least, I hope that sensible USAnians will draw some comfort from the Trump-rejecting results here and in Canada.

6. Conclusion

Okay, sorry about that. I just wanted to get it off my chest. For the first time in months the future looks a little brighter.
42
General Discussion / Re: The Trump Presidency
« Last post by raven on May 01, 2025, 08:30:51 PM »
So, Canada, after the election, how's your home and native land?

(We have our federal election tomorrow...)
Could be much worse, we didn't end up with Temu Trump as PM, and  but my riding flipped to Con in a situation where less folks voted for the guy who won but not as any kind of united front. Best hopes your end! In many ways, Australia and Canada are alike: we both have a thinly populated interior with lots of wonderful, potentially dangerous  critters and a more populous crust of population, and we both have more of a history of racism than we often like to admit or deal with.
43
General Discussion / Re: The Trump Presidency
« Last post by Peter B on May 01, 2025, 06:14:55 PM »
So, Canada, after the election, how's your home and native land?

(We have our federal election tomorrow...)
44
Other Conspiracy Theories / Re: HBO Miniseries From the Earth to the Moon
« Last post by Obviousman on April 25, 2025, 05:02:28 PM »
That reminds me of the early days of Star Trek and when they first introduced the Orion slave girls. The actresses were painted a deep green but when the directors viewed the rushes, the colour of the Orions was all washed out. They increased the colour intensity by using brighter skin paint but time and time again when the rushes were viewed, the green skin colour of the Orion slave girls would be washed out.

Finally in frustration, the director asked the film processors if there was anything strange about the film being used. At first he said no but then remarked that they had been having trouble with some of the colours: these dancing girls kept on coming up with a dark green skin colour and they were having a terrible time trying to get rid of the green!
45
Other Conspiracy Theories / Re: HBO Miniseries From the Earth to the Moon
« Last post by Jason Thompson on April 25, 2025, 07:59:51 AM »
Remastering also brings in color gamut issues and resolution issues. Most television at the time was shot on 35 mm film. You have to make different color correction and contrast correction choices when remastering for modern televisions. The "red" command uniforms in Star Trek: The Next Generation are actually fuchsia. All the processing decisions made during shooting and video transfer back then were made with certain assumptions in mind.

Yes, I've seen the comparison shots in which people have pointed out that you can now see the woodgrain and cardboard in the 24th century sets and props. One of the fascinating things before any of this was really a big thing was getting books about the production of such series and seeing pictures of the props. The hero props with moving parts and working lights look great, the others... not so much. But they didn't have to be because they'd be seen in long shot for a few seconds at a time taking up about 0.5% of the overall screen area, so crude construction and paint jobs were adequate.

I remember a big fuss about colour balancing issues on the release of the Doctor Who story 'The Invasion of Time'. TV production in the 70s was typically a mix of video in studio and film on location (more or less but we won't get into the minutiae!). When they came to release this story on DVD the colour balancing of the video and film sequences resulted in one character's robes appearing to change colour depending on which room he was in, being purple on one and red on another. Same costume, different colour effects of the media which were not fully accounted for in the remaster.

This has also bled into recent colourisation efforts for black and white Doctor Who stories. The TARDIS console room was always described as a 'gleaming white' futuristic control room. In monochrome TV production, white was about the worst thing it could be because it would just flare on the cameras. So they would design the sets with colours that would appear white on the screen. The TARDIS console in the 1960s was in fact very pale green. They never bothered re-painting it when it appeared in the first few colour seasons so the true green colour was there on screen for people to enjoy. We also uncovered a plethora of colour production stills from the time which showed the floor of the set to be blue.

So when they came to colourise some of those old stories, they've been colourised to match the reality of the sets rather than the intention of the producers. While the technical aspects of the work are superb, I do think that might have been the wrong choice.
46
Other Conspiracy Theories / Re: HBO Miniseries From the Earth to the Moon
« Last post by Ranb on April 24, 2025, 07:11:54 PM »
Watched it during its initial run and half a dozen times since.  I can't speak to the veracity of all the scenes; like the movie "Apollo 13" some dramatic license is taken in a number of places, but I don't think anything's wildly inaccurate.   
I thought that the inclusion of the fictional characters was distracting and unnecessary; Especially
in the episodes about Apollo 7 and Apollo 13.  I did like the reaction shot of Emmett Seaborn when Al Bean burned out the video camera on the lunar surface.  The rest was lame. 
47
Other Conspiracy Theories / Re: HBO Miniseries From the Earth to the Moon
« Last post by JayUtah on April 24, 2025, 12:15:01 PM »
Remastering also brings in color gamut issues and resolution issues. Most television at the time was shot on 35 mm film. You have to make different color correction and contrast correction choices when remastering for modern televisions. The "red" command uniforms in Star Trek: The Next Generation are actually fuchsia. All the processing decisions made during shooting and video transfer back then were made with certain assumptions in mind.

You can obtain quite a bit of resolution from 35 mm film, but when planning for 480p broadcast, the film appropriately captures more resolution than you want or need. Set designers and builders in the pre-HDTV era had a very good eye for what would pass. When you actually visit these sets you can see how frankly crudely a lot of it is built. And this is important when sticking to schedule and budget. I talked to a few of the original TNG set and prop designers who were a little embarrassed to see all their shortcuts revealed in glorious 1080i.

As I said above, our documentary was shot using FTETTM space suits, but on video instead of 35 mm film. Now I really want to see what the 35 mm original footage looks like. We had the original suit fabricator on set, from Global Effects. He showed me the shortcuts such as silver nylon fabric used instead of Chromel-R ($1,300 per yard). I have access to an A7L suit (with the original Chromel-R), so maybe one of my projects can be to compare the photography under different conditions and see how close they got.

If anyone wants to rent an A7L replica used on the series, here's the link.
https://newsite.globaleffects.com/GEI_Site/C_b03_frameset.html
48
Other Conspiracy Theories / Re: HBO Miniseries From the Earth to the Moon
« Last post by Jason Thompson on April 24, 2025, 04:08:18 AM »
I'm a little mad that they reformatted it to 16:9; all the shots were composed for a 4:3 screen, and some really important stuff (like the stuck thruster on Gemini 8) winds up off screen in the remaster.

It bugs the hell out of me when things get remastered into a different aspect ratio. Even I, a non-expert in the field of TV and film, can fathom that shots and scenes would have been blocked for the intended aspect ratio of presentation (that's why people in many TV shows often stand unnaturally close to each other when conversing: the 4:3 ratio needs them to do that to get them both in shot together in anything but a wide shot!). Therefore, if you make it widescreen by trimming the top and bottom you lose stuff, and if you extend to the sides you get stuff on screen that was never supposed to be. The fact that stuff actually gets released after such alteration boggles my mind, because of the number of people the product must have got past who thought 'yeah, that's fine'. And so we have things like the missing thruster you describe, or the infamous Buffy and Angel releases that are full of crew and production hardware, or actors awaiting their cue to enter, on the extended screen width. Sheer infuriating idiocy, and frankly I find it disrespectful to the original creative team.
49
Other Conspiracy Theories / Re: HBO Miniseries From the Earth to the Moon
« Last post by Jason Thompson on April 24, 2025, 04:01:10 AM »
I absolutely love this series. There's a fair bit of dramatic licence, of course, but when condensing events that took place over days, months or years into a series of 1-hour episodes that's unavoidable. A completely faithful adaptation would, most likely, be unutterably dull!

I love the attention to detail and the work put in to replicating the hardware (which makes things like the Saturn V footage that found its way into the Apollo 7 episode all the more baffling!), and that they tried to find ways to make the series much more than just a cataloguing of the missions. The drama, humour and raw emotion they got into it makes for a great and rewarding viewing experience.

Somewhat ironically, the episode I found least enjoyable was the Apollo 13 episode, but since they had not long done Apollo 13 as a movie they had to find a different angle for it. I don't think it's bad, it just doesn't hold my attention so much.
50
Other Conspiracy Theories / Re: HBO Miniseries From the Earth to the Moon
« Last post by jfb on April 23, 2025, 05:07:56 PM »
Watched it during its initial run and half a dozen times since.  I can't speak to the veracity of all the scenes; like the movie "Apollo 13" some dramatic license is taken in a number of places, but I don't think anything's wildly inaccurate.   

I'm a little mad that they reformatted it to 16:9; all the shots were composed for a 4:3 screen, and some really important stuff (like the stuck thruster on Gemini 8) winds up off screen in the remaster. 

But otherwise, it's amazing.  "That's All There Is" (Apollo 12) is probably the high point of the series, followed closely by "Spider" (Apollo 9) and "The Original Wives Club" (multiple).   
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10