91
The Hoax Theory / Re: AI making debunking harder...
« Last post by Jason Thompson on December 28, 2025, 03:20:31 PM »I'm frustrated by the number of apparently genuine lunar surface images I am seeing, but with the Earth inserted, presumably for aesthetic reasons. How are we to respond to these?
Depends on what they claim to be showing. Composite images have been around for ages, and unless they're purporting to be actual images as taken by an astronaut I see no issue with them (quite the reverse, as several hoax believers have tried to cite composite or otherwise edited pics in astronaut-penned books as evidence of a hoax only to have to be reminded that there's a difference between illustrative imagery and a claim that something is a genuine photo).
The AI ones bug the hell out of me because they show something that is obviously (to anyone with even a passing familiarity) not an actual scene. Just today I saw one with an astronaut at the footpad of something that bore no resemblance to an actual LM, with nothing resembling a ladder anywhere, and two other astronauts poking their heads out of a huge hatch. Other posts that do show actual Apollo images are emblazoned with captions stating they are not AI, CGI or photoshop.
It seems its now so bloody easy to make all these fake crap images that the presumption of authenticity in photographic records has been permanently undermined.

Recent Posts
