Author Topic: Apollo redundancy - hypothetical question  (Read 3991 times)

Offline onebigmonkey

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1607
  • ALSJ Clown
    • Apollo Hoax Debunked
Apollo redundancy - hypothetical question
« on: January 08, 2016, 02:16:13 AM »
I'm currently reading Mailer's 'A fire on the moon' and have reached the part where he describes, in detail, the number of spare circuits, pipes, valves and so on that formed a part of each Apollo rocket assembly.

I got to wondering: If they could have been absolutely certain that nothing would go wrong, and that every part would work flawlessly and no accidents or emergencies would happen, how much smaller could the rocket have been? How much mass did all the extra safety mechanisms amount to in the system?

Apollo 13, obviously...

Offline Allan F

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
Re: Apollo redundancy - hypothetical question
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2016, 08:55:40 PM »
One could speculate that some of the redundancy could be taken out and the main components engineered a little bit bigger and stronger.
Well, it is like this: The truth doesn't need insults. Insults are the refuge of a darkened mind, a mind that refuses to open and see. Foul language can't outcompete knowledge. And knowledge is the result of education. Education is the result of the wish to know more, not less.