This should settle it one way or the other...

[HeadLikeARock]

It once again reminds me of that old fraud, Jack White. He said words to the effect of:

'I am open to any evidence that proves I am wrong, however since the landings were faked, any evidence that says otherwise must itself be faked and can therefore be dismissed'.

I kinda miss Jack and his twisted logic. The Education Forum just isn't the same as the "good old days"!

[bknight]

For us it will be good to view the sites albeit from a distance.  Personally I would suggest a trip to A12 and then examine Surveyor 3 which is not in the exclusion zone and it has been there for 3 more years than any of the Apollo landings.

I've written to them suggesting A15 would be better. Mount Hadley, Apennine Mountains, Hadley Rille, a 3 day J class mission with assorted accoutrement including lunar rover to investigate.

Have you heard back from them?

[Obviousman]

It once again reminds me of that old fraud, Jack White. He said words to the effect of:

'I am open to any evidence that proves I am wrong, however since the landings were faked, any evidence that says otherwise must itself be faked and can therefore be dismissed'.

I kinda miss Jack and his twisted logic. The Education Forum just isn't the same as the "good old days"!

Yeah, he was so incompetent he was a very easy target. Then Fetzer tried his luck and he was just as bad. No-one to play with anymore....

(Well, I could wade into the JFK area but I don't know enough about the subject to be able to argue any point effectively)

[Glom]

Yep. Remember:

They cried for evidence and when it was given, they cried "FAKE!".

"Where are the images?" they cried, and when it was given, they cried "FAKE!".

It once again reminds me of that old fraud, Jack White. He said words to the effect of:

'I am open to any evidence that proves I am wrong, however since the landings were faked, any evidence that says otherwise must itself be faked and can therefore be dismissed'.

He sounds a very articulate woo woo.