An interesting development I'm seeing on at least one HB facebook group is a narrowing of focus. Whereas a hefty chunk of the members bleat out the usual uneducated garbage, the page admins (including the blunder) are increasingly intolerant of things that are obviously incorrect.
They're pointing out that yes, rockets work in space, no you wouldn't expect stars in photographs and so on. One of them (who claims to work for the CNSA on some free energy BS or other - he really doesn't) is perfectly happy that a rocket made its way to the moon and took photos to prove it, just that it was unmanned and all photos were from a camera mounted outside.
He kind of skips over the stuff that makes that theory impossible, but he will respond to other posters pointing out their errors while still maintaining his own fiction as fact. He thinks the actual astronauts stayed in LEO, and their must have been secret second launches to achieve that.
What they're trying to avoid, they claim, is people posting nonsense that makes them, and by extension their theory, look stupid. It's a full time job