Straight from the HB playbook of, something might be possible(in their opinion) therefore it was hoaxed. The problems aren't whether it was possible to do this on video in 1969-1972, it's how do you recreate the absurd motion encountered when the speed is altered for gravity.
Horizontal actions are unaffected by gravity. Meaning that whilst you see vertical motion "corrected" from altering playback speed, the horizontal activity is unaffected and looks insanely odd. Some of these EVA sequences were continuous unbroken over 40 minutes (I am not sure the largest time). So the 30 second figure quoted is not even going to come close.
My HB rationale is that "Apollo cannot break physics." - this is impossible. Yet they have, many times. So I am trying to reconcile this impossibility, and I believe the claim that "video tech in 1969 wasn't sufficient" is a far weaker claim. And I'm seeing PNA's over-reach here, making false claims about the lack of tech (still present SG Collins original video which even SG Collins admitted was wrong). Why lie, if you are standing on the truth?
I don't agree with your "vertical vs. horizontal" issue. A slow forward jump, will ALSO result in slower horizontal speed... thus it's fully consistent with low-gravity. They are not playing the "Launch of the projectile" at full-speed, then slowing down only the trajectory -- they are slowing done BOTH -- thus the horizontal speed of projection is also slowed to 40%. Thus it's consistent with the vertical/gravity component as well. 100% consistency.
Do you really think my argument here is untrue? This basic simple physics.
@Allen F - promised me "smart scientific minds" here on this forum. But so far, I'm getting responses from people who don't seem to understand basic simple physics.
@Mag40 - I apologize for my offense here to you. I just think you might be in over your head on this. Maybe I'm missing something.
Is there anyone here, who can make arguments that demonstrate a solid understanding of physics?
