Don't know what I was expecting, but not what I'm seeing...is that snow in one of those images?, or am I suffering from a case of pareidolia?
Probably dust.
I think that the surface is a lot more like rock, than what I would have expected. All these years of envisaging a what a "dirty snowball" looks like, did not ready me for this!
Comets have been imaged before...they're some of the blackest objects in the solar system, covered with gunk left behind by ice that has sublimated away. Less of a snowball with some specks of dirt in it, and more of one covered in blackened frozen mud, dust, and bits of rock.
The surface under Philae is apparently an unexpectedly hard and solid crust of largely water ice. I guess they expected a smoother transition from surface dust to icy granular material, perhaps not expecting the crust to form at the temperatures and pressures involved.
With the news regarding the problem of charging the batteries, people are asking why weren't RTGs used... why weren't they? I would guess ESA had a good reason, but I don't know enough about the subject to comment.
Apart from the politics, they didn't and still don't have RTGs developed for use, and it was to be a short duration high-risk mission that would have wasted most of an RTG's potential.