Begging the question. Suppose you quantify how much the print should actually be disturbed. Since most papers on the subject suggest this occurs at the micron level, what is your quantifiable claim related to how that would change the visible print?
Would it be possible for you to drop this attitude that you are currently exhibiting? It may be the fad on Facebook, but it doesn't impress on this forum.
Good question, and yes, this needs to be addressed in my research, which I plan to do. Before I started, I wanted to know if anyone here has seen this claim or tried to rebut it, or seen it rebutted. So that I could address the rebuttals at the same time.
I don't really have any "attitude" here; I'm just trying to be efficient, and it's not fruitful when people who have no clue about physics try to answer physics questions. I want them to stop adding zero to the actual debate.
You seem to be a Mix -- you at least seem to have some good understanding of the concepts. I still think you've got some major gaps. Let's see how our debate settles out for "projectile motion" - where I believe the actual Physics FACT is that they are the same on both planets, if you simply just slow down the initial velocity to 40% for the moon -- it will produce the EXACT SAME trajectory path. Do you REALLY contend that I'm wrong here? Or maybe we're talking past each other. PLEASE ANSWER THIS IN THE OTHER THREAD, NOT HERE....
