« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Nice in here isn't it.  (Read 19306 times)

Offline Captain Swoop

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 31
Nice in here isn't it.
« on: March 08, 2012, 05:07:28 PM »
Don't make a mess on the new carpet and mind the paintwork.
Logged

Offline Nowhere Man

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2012, 06:55:26 PM »
"Captaion" Swoop?  Are you a doppelganger, an evil twin, or fat-fingered?  Welcome.

Fred
Logged
Hey, you!  "It's" with an apostrophe means "it is" or "it has."  "Its" without an apostrophe means "belongs to it."

"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684

Offline Captain Swoop

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 31
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2012, 07:44:00 AM »
Oopsies!
Logged

Offline Captain Swoop

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 31
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2012, 07:12:48 PM »
there ya go.
Logged

Offline Nowhere Man

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2012, 09:12:53 PM »
Hi there, Cap'n.  I shoulda grabbed a screen shot, for posterity, ya know.

Fred
Logged
Hey, you!  "It's" with an apostrophe means "it is" or "it has."  "Its" without an apostrophe means "belongs to it."

"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684

Offline Nowhere Man

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2012, 09:14:01 PM »
By the way, I just realized that your thread title could very easily be followed with, "Be a shame if something happened to it."

Fred
Logged
Hey, you!  "It's" with an apostrophe means "it is" or "it has."  "Its" without an apostrophe means "belongs to it."

"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684

Offline twik

  • Jupiter
  • ***
  • Posts: 595
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2012, 04:06:29 PM »
It's lovely. But give it a couple of months, it'll be full of reference books left open on all available surfaces, and pizza delivery receipts with orbital calculations on the back.
Logged

Offline DataCable

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2012, 06:06:33 PM »
Quote from: twik on March 14, 2012, 04:06:29 PM
...and pizza delivery receipts with orbital calculations on the back.
Recipts?  Boxes!
Logged
Bearer of the highly coveted "I Found Venus In 9 Apollo Photos" sweatsocks.

"you data is still open for interpretation, after all a NASA employee might of wipe a booger or dropped a hair on it" - showtime

DataCable2015 A+

Offline Inanimate Carbon Rod

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 271
    • evilscience
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #8 on: May 16, 2012, 08:34:20 AM »
These are much better premises than the last, and it seems a shame that the woos have already stunk the place out with the smell of crazy.
Logged
Formerly Supermeerkat. Like you care.

Offline BazBear

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 396
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #9 on: May 16, 2012, 04:38:38 PM »
Quote from: supermeerkat on May 16, 2012, 08:34:20 AM
These are much better premises than the last, and it seems a shame that the woos have already stunk the place out with the smell of crazy.
The old place had that cozy "lived in" feel, but I do like the spiffy new look. And I guess with a name like ApolloHoax.net, we have to expect some woos are going to be drawn in, like moths to a flame. Burn 'em I say! ;D
Logged
"It's true you know. In space, no one can hear you scream like a little girl." - Mark Watney, protagonist of The Martian by Andy Weir

Offline Echnaton

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1490
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2012, 07:19:35 PM »
Quote from: supermeerkat on May 16, 2012, 08:34:20 AM
These are much better premises than the last, and it seems a shame that the woos have already stunk the place out with the smell of crazy.
How else can we discuss hoax theories?  The board  is far more entertaining when the woos are here.
Logged
The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new. —Samuel Beckett

Offline ChrLz

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2012, 07:42:48 AM »
Quote from: Echnaton on May 16, 2012, 07:19:35 PM
How else can we discuss hoax theories?  The board  is far more entertaining when the woos are here.
Yes, somewhat..

So shall we invite fattydash/Patrick/Dastardly/etc/etc back?  He's now active at abovetopsecret, after he got shunted from jref.

Hmmmmm, maybe not...
Logged

Offline Echnaton

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1490
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2012, 09:26:32 AM »
Quote from: ChrLz on May 17, 2012, 07:42:48 AM
So shall we invite fattydash/Patrick/Dastardly/etc/etc back? 

He was given ample opportunity to have his say about a moon hoax.  The fact is that after we indulged him for plenty of time and he had nothing but personal prejudices to bring to the discussion, so he has nothing more to add to the board. 

Now though we know from experience that hoax believers really have nothing more than personal prejudices, if we are to have a hoax discussion board, we must invite each new believer in in order to make the individual prejudices obvious, or until their behavior justifies banishment.

edited for clarity
« Last Edit: May 17, 2012, 01:04:23 PM by Echnaton »
Logged
The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new. —Samuel Beckett

Offline twik

  • Jupiter
  • ***
  • Posts: 595
Re: Nice in here isn't it.
« Reply #13 on: May 17, 2012, 10:56:39 AM »
Well, I think at this point, we must assume that the chances of a hoax proponent bringing well-supported, logical arguments is pretty low. Not zero, but we must consider the subject, which makes such things difficult.

Patrick was interesting, in that he did seem to have more interest in scientific details than most proponents, and didn't just go over the same old list from Cosmic Dave et al. He did stimulate some good discussion in the rebuttals. His obsession with the topic is worrying, though.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »