Yes, Rogan's been taken to task before on these and similar errors. He just doesn't care; he gets too much attention I suppose from repeating them.
The NASA photo archives contain both training and mission photography. I'm certainly unaware of any instance in which NASA intentionally passed off a training photograph as one taken on a mission. But I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it happened once or twice accidentally. There's just too much demand and too much material for that not to have happened by accident. I am nevertheless aware of several examples in which hoax claimants have tried to pass off training photographs as mission photographs.
Spacecraft Films has high-resolution footage from all the missions, including Apollo 11 television and motion-picture film. Claims that NASA is hiding footage or releasing only degraded versions of it simply fall flat in the 21st century.
Quite a lot of fringe argumentation alleges "violation of the laws of physics" as a way of begging the question of whether the claimant's understanding is correct. Ostensibly the claimant sees something in the evidence that, to him, seems wrong. But casting it as "violating the laws of physics" rather than saying "I don't understand what's happening here" tends to push away the possibility that the claimant's expectations are naive or wrong. It's usually productive to ask the claimant to delve more deeply into the physics, because usually you find he can't. That exposes the "laws of physics" smokescreen. But on the other hand, humans have a very highly adapted intuition for dynamics -- in Earth gravity. Often you can show that the intuition doesn't hold for different environments. You compel the claimant to become more intellectually aware of what he takes as intuitive gospel.
It's unfortunate that our subsequent space programs have kept manned spaceflight so close to Earth. It certainly has not been NASA's desire to do so. Congress keeps defunding every proposed effort to fly farther. So it's hard to imagine that NASA supposed desire to keep secret the true hazards of space flight are to blame. But while humans have stayed close to home, other efforts have not. Unmanned space missions are just as susceptible as humans to radiation. More so, because humans have the built-in capacity for healing while electronics do not. Hence to build spacecraft on a commercial footing to operate in and through the Van Allen belts (e.g., GPS satellites), we still need to have a correct understanding of the trapped radiation environment. It cannot be credibly argued -- limitations on manned spaceflight notwithstanding -- that NASA is effectively keeping secret the true nature of our environment. Apollo did not travel through the most intense portions of the Van Allen belts. As a number of our illustrious members have shown, it's possible to determine from the published data where the spacecraft actually went, and to estimate the dosage they would have received. Plus, on the subject of whether the Van Allen belts would have posed a problem for the Apollo astronauts, I'll take the word of the astrophysicist who discovered them over the speculation of a comedian.
It's true Nazis (well, to be fair, ex-Nazis) never ran the whole space program. But some like Dr. von Braun did serve in high positions of authority in NASA. It's probably true that without the contribution of von Braun and his team the Apollo program would not have been as successful. So that contribution cannot be overlooked, nor the contributions of the American, Canadian, and English aerospace experts and industries that did the actual building. But it's not such a polarized situation. it's not as if the ex-Nazis were the lords and masters of the program, nor that they were merely the slaves of some other NASA overlord.
And of course we've thoroughly investigated what actually happened with the allegedly fake Dutch moonrock. It was a case of mistaken identity on the Dutch side, having nothing to do with NASA. But I guess in Rogan's case the facts shouldn't get in the way of an entertaining story.
