i didn't know. after CQ we didnt speak for a long time and there was no need for me to log into there as i didnt have issues answering people or finding details.
There is no "after CQ". Both accounts are still live.
I'm not quite sure why Tim claiming to have been banned is my fault.
Nobody said it was. Strawman.
After a while i contacted Tim to see how he was and have a general chat. he provided me with more questions regarding the same topic and as i had asked some other questions on this forum i decided to try here to finally finish it off.
Not what actually happened here. Any conversations you may or may not have had with TF are none of our business and unverifiable in any case.
i started with 'i have a friend' because i didnt know if the same people who were on cosmoquest were on here and i thought it was a polite way to start off a thread.
We have the same internet handles. Surely that gave you a clue, no?
yes i am suggesting that. no non cynical person would believe that.
It has actually happened plenty of times. Patrick Tekeli springs to mind, a man with so many socks that there are not enough drawers in the universe. I know you are not him because he is dead.
if somebody asks me a question my mind doesnt immediately go through a whole list of things as to why i shouldnt answer. i just answer it to the best of my knowledge.
Irrelevant. Most here would do likewise. The problem is that the corpus CT uses these very tactics to insinuate themselves like a bacterial infection into truth, knowledge and honesty. Perhaps you have found yourself unintentionally jumping through those hoops without foreknowledge that these are games we have all seen CTists perform over and over and over. It is a form of the "good cop, bad cop" routine. Again.
you seem to be confused about the facebook pages. this information was happily given.
Read back up thread. It was not happily given. The amount of dodging and obfuscation was a sight to behold, all for a link that was at your fingertips.
i actually gave more links than was nessecary.
Who exactly determined what was "necessary"? Given the links, the members could determine if they were sufficient.
there was no double act formed. i actually dont believe the radiation issue was discussed on the facebook groups. it was other topics such as the size of the earth.
And now you are claiming that the links you provided were off-topic. And you knew it.
so yes i am perplexed.
Well, if providing the links requested perplexes you, then I must perforce agree. You are indeed perplexed.
if you feel you are some higher being that has to look after everybody here then thats fine but i again repeat what Luke said. lets focus on the facts and what is asked on the forum.
Strawman and I did that already.
lets not delve into any side stories.
No, you are attempting to cast the "side story" as unimportant. From my perspective, it may be the most important aspect.
Are you and TF one and the same?
Are you and TF two individuals playing a game?
Are you and TF two individuals who are new to all of this?
And so on. The only method I have to make this determination is the evidence I have before me, and what am I to make of that?
i understand many people have created sock accounts etc and tried to fool others here but at the end of the day i havent and i have shown i havent so i am not really clear as to why my name is still being soiled.
Because you have not done that. All I or anyone knows is whatever you self present. As we stand, the evidence is that you and TF are one and the same individual. Have you other evidence to present?
in my opinion the moon landings did happen and also in my opinion the radiation issue with Tim is now closed.
Neither of those are matters of opinion. It is a fact that the moon landings happened as advertised and it is a fact that TF does not accept the preceding fact.
as i say he hasnt contacted me for quite some time so i can only assume he has accepted the findings or simply realised he isnt going to get past the expertise here.
That is naive. TF wants the moon hoax as a matter of religious belief and those are not subject to reason.
which ever is the case none of this means i am a hoax believer and if you think i am or you think i have some alterier motive then you are wrong. plain and simple.
WTF? "alterier"? Really? Is that some breed of dog?
abaddon
i have absolutely no interest in carrying on this ridiculous conversation.
you are the only person still questioning this so i'll let you carry on doing that if you wish.
if i have any questions in the future i will be happy to ask here. if you wish to answer do so. if you don't then don't. any questions i do ask will be to further my knowledge.
as i hadn't been on cq for a while quite a few names were new to me. apologies for trying to appear pleasant.
If Tim is up for a skype call with you to show you he is really him and i am me i will be more than happy to proceed.
if you can tell me a way to share a facebook messenger message (all of it) i will be happy to share that with you.
i have no interest in pretending to be somebody i'm not.
your wrong about the FB. as soon as Tim pointed out to me which one it was i happily shared it. (as i said quite a few times i have been in and out of a few over time)
i gave more links to FB groups than asked. actually ones Tim was never a member of. this was to show i actually believed they were real. so no not off Topic it was to show we were different people and had the views we claimed we did.
so i think i have covered everything there. the main thing is we are who we say. if a skype call is needed i can do that. again i havent spoken to Tim for a while but you can ask him here or on facebook.
Abaddon can i just say now i won't stand for my name being soiled anywhere but also i won't simply go back and forth with nit pick arguments.
so if you wish to believe that i am a HB fine. I'm telling you i'm not. if you choose not to believe then fine. if i ask any more questions here to further my knowledge it obviously is up to you if you wish to answer.
HOWEVER
i won't reply to anymore of you comments on this or any other thread which relates to me being who i say i am. to me that is insulting and i have no interest in continuing to prove to you who i say i am.
many thanks for any contribution you made to showing where Tim was wrong. all entries on this thread have been interesting to me and have furthered my knowledge very much.
