“I see nothing in that statement that speaks to your ability to interpret blueprints. Try again.”
I couldn’t possibly answer that question until I saw them. I know what the plans are for and what these contraptions are meant to do, so who knows, I may be capable of proving to myself that at least the Rover could possibly fold up inside the Landers trunk and then unfold into a functional moon buggy.
“So how many engines would satisfy you? Why do you need more than one as evidence?”
“Pity they couldn’t be arsed looking for the rest of it, because that where it’ll be.”
You will notice, I said “the rest of it” and not “the rest of them”. I was referring to the rest of the rocket, including the bits, they say they got into space.
“I also found the flashlight trick amusing, it’s a pity they never spun one of those food bags in mid “air”, although it wouldn’t be as easy without the aid of CGI.”
“Exactly what was the state of the art in CGI in 1969?”
It was non-existent, why do you ask?
You people are really annoying me now, I feel like I am talking to children here, can’t you digest a simple sentence without getting it totally wrong? The words “without the aid of CGI.” Should have gave you a clue, but because the initials “CGI” are in uppercase, that is all you noticed, and you went straight to your keyboard to ask your ridiculous question.
“I don't think Cambo actually understands the meaning of the word "extort"
“And where, pray tell, has all this "extorted" tax money gone? How many NASA employees have holiday homes in the Bahamas, and drive Ferraris?”
“Only the ones that were in on it.”
I was answering the second part of your question, not the first part. Again, this inability you have to digest information is annoying. Or maybe you think you are being clever, twisting people’s words?
“he could not find the little ladder to debunk himself each morning to eat his coco pops, let alone debunk anyone else. I felt that was quite spontaneous.”
Well done! Sorry I didn’t give you the credit you so richly deserve, when you first said it.
“Just like the Vikings sent monkeys off in longboats to see if it was possible to sail a small boat from Iceland to Vinland."
Monkeys can’t sail boats, and I am laughing already, at the thought of you all searching the internet for a picture of a monkey sailing a boat, my wife nearly phoned an ambulance, as she feared my spleen would explode. I don’t think they had remote control either, which renders your analogy complete crap.
Dig this, if you haven't already:
http://www.arrl.org/eavesdropping-on-apollo-11
Thanks so much for posting that story, I’ve read it before, but I enjoyed reading it again, so thanks again.
“What, like modern day engineers examining the F-1 engines to see how they worked, even going so far as to test fire one?”
As I’ve previously stated, those bits worked.
Like modern applications that are directly linked to Apollo?
https://www.computerworld.com/article/2525898/app-development/nasa-s-apollo-technology-has-changed-history.html
So you think electronics would not be as advanced, if not for Apollo?
"Without it, you wouldn't have a laptop. You'd still have things like the Univac."
That’s priceless! Go NASA!
“this allows him to see right through all that annoying science to the obvious hoax that lies beyond”
No science is needed to realise it would be suicide to try and land on the moon, in a cardboard box that was never landed anywhere, let alone the moon.
No science is needed to spot blue sky and clouds through a window, when Apollo 11 was supposedly half way to the moon.
It doesn’t take a psychiatrist to find it odd, how calm they sound when their lives are at risk, as apposed to how terrified they look and sound, while being interviewed.
There is no scientific explanation as to why there is no noticeable disturbance under the Landers from their thruster. Anyone who says otherwise are either lying or brainwashed.
Science can’t explain why no country has sent people beyond the safety of Earth orbit since Apollo.
I don’t need science to wonder why an astronaut who supposedly walked on the moon, would not know about the radiation belts, the lying little sod.
