“Stop it with the insults and attitude or you won't last long”
Noted.
I also want you to start using the quote feature, please. It makes your posts easier to read, and it also let's us know who you're talking to. It's pretty easy to do, you just wrap the quoted text inside opening and closing quote tags. Like this:
[quote]
Quoted text goes here.
[/quote]
You can cite the person you're quoting by adding "author=username" to the opening quote tag, like this:
[quote author=cambo]
Quoted text goes here.
[/quote]
There is even a button in the post editor to simplify it for you so that you don't have to manually type the quote tags. It looks like this:
Just highlight the text you want to turn into a quote and then click that button.
“A tell - all book "I Worked on the Moon Hoax" with proof (secret photos, work orders, pay stubs) would make the author a lot of MONEY!”
You’ve been given a ton of money to stay quiet, where is your logic?
I hate to bring current day politics into this, but Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal were given a ton of money to stay quiet, but they exposed their affairs with President Trump any way. Bribery doesn't guaranty silence if someone with more money comes along to entice you to speak.
You can deny or ignore all of the facts if you want, but you don't have logic on your side. If going to the Moon is impossible for some reason, NASA could have saved themselves a lot of money (and embarrassment) by just coming right out and saying so. Why was it necessary to fake it? To fool the Russians? But I thought the Russians were in on it too?
“As a matter of fact, cambo, why don't you write your proof of the moon hoax into a book and have a best seller? Don't you want to make a lot of MONEY!?”
What proof?
Exactly. You have no proof, so why should we take you, or your logically flawed argument, seriously? NASA says they went to the Moon, and they provided thousands of photos, hours of video and audio, and physical evidence like unflown spacecraft and Moon rocks to back up their claims. You have nothing but the greatest hits of Jarrah White that have been debunked for years.
“Serious question - how much money would it take to buy your silence for the rest of your life? Think about it for more than a couple of minutes. A hundred bucks? A thousand? A million? A million a year?”
A couple of hundred grand would do me at my time of life, but for someone a lot younger, maybe five million.
And what if someone offered you $10 million to break your silence? Or what if, at the end of your life, you decided "hell, I don't need money anymore, so I'm going to throw a wrench in the machine and expose the hoax!"?
“How much money would the first person who could credibly expose the Apollo missions as a hoax make by comparison?”
What good is money if you are dead?
See my comment above regarding death bed confessions.
“And countless more who didn't work for NASA at the time of Apollo, but still have (or will have) the capability to expose the hoax.”
You know the answer to that one, but I’ll humour you. The people making the nuts and bolts weren’t present on the movie set.
Do you really think only the people present on the movie set would be capable of exposing a hoax like that?
If, for example, NASA claimed the Van Allen radiation didn't pose a risk when it really did, that would be a lie they can't control. They can't stop someone else 5 years, 10 years, 50 years, 100 years, or 500 years later from studying the radiation and discovering that NASA lied about it. They can't stop someone else from going to the alleged Apollo landing sites and discovering there are no footprints.
The hoax would be 100% guaranteed to fail eventually, and NASA would know that... so why do it? This is why the hoax theory fails the logic test, even if you ignore all of the other evidence that the Moon landings really happened.
“And this means that to continue to protect the hoax, new generations have to be made privy to the secret as older generations die off; so continues the possibility of exposure.”
By new generations, do you mean the sons, grandchildren and great grandchildren of the film crew and NASA’s top brass?
You're not thinking big enough. Why limit it to just the "friends & family" of people who worked for NASA? Why are they the only ones that you believe could expose the hoax?
Let the original hoaxers go to their graves...
Again, why do you believe the hoax would die with them? How do you stop other people with scientific curiosity, or commercial endeavors, from discovering the truth? And remember, the lie would have to be protected for the rest of time. It doesn't go away just because the original perpetrators have died.
“And as for the dusty sand, would you care to explain why the material on the ground looks and behaves like a cohesive powder - similar to flour or talcum powder?”
No it doesn’t, it looks like sand, you are only seeing what you want to see.
Have you never driven down a dirt road and left a mile long dust cloud behind you? That doesn't happen in the Apollo footage.
