Morgan was surely kidnapped by Masons.
Even if this is so, there is a huge leap from some members of one lodge doing something dodgy to the entire organisation worldwide being suspect. But then you've never had trouble making those huge leaps from small steps, have you?
Sure many important people can be part of specialized organizations that help them develop their skills. But we don't find all this influence all over the world and that big number of very high ranking people in it.
Translation: I didn't know there were other organisations and membership groups with high-ranking people in, and now that I've been given such lists they are not important anyway.
The issue is that if you control all the sensitive institutions you can rule to a great extent and influence decisions.
Again, there is a world of difference between members of a club being in power and that club itself controlling institutions. Freemasons exist the world over. Even in the US there are masons in all the political parties, and they can't even agree with each other. That does not equate to a single, over-arching control of the world's institutions.
Nothing about the world's governments at the moment speaks of any one group controlling it all. Politics is getting more and more fractured these days. All the conspiracy theories are nicely watertight, though, because a) they rely on secretive institutions that by definition can never openly state their intentions, and b) they are either demonstrating the control by forging alliances or covering it up by staging conflicts. There's nothing rational in proposing such a control system, and no evidence to support it.