Pretend you are an ordinary person wanting to find out "why do some people question the moon landing", then turn to Google/YT and see what you can find.
This is easy for me. When I first encountered the idea that the Moon landings had been faked, I didn't feel I had enough information to draw a conclusion in either direction. So I researched. I quickly found the absence of good evidence for the hoax to which you allude. Absence of evidence, however, is not evidence of absence, so I decided to vet the evidence I could find in support of the Apollo program. A great deal of it was over my head, so I had to do a lot of research in a number of different fields to be sure that what I was seeing was accurate. I had to brush up on my calculus and physics, I learned a great deal about geology, radiation, engineering, etc. It took months, and while I lack any professional qualifications, I learned enough to recognize that things I was reading were verifiably true. I was also willing to find materials that weren't available on the internet to assist my research.
Your insistence on only vetting hoax material is a critical flaw in your process. Attempting to debunk the supporting evidence would be even more valuable for proving a hoax claim, but you're unwilling to exert that kind of effort.
But if you look up Flat Earth - you'll find PLENTY of videos by people who actually believe the Earth is Flat -- AND also don't think we went to the moon.
I spent a great deal of time engaging with flat earthers (far too much time, tbh) and trying to identify and correct their errors. I know you're too close to the problem to see this, but your arguments are not fundamentally different in structure or scope than theirs.
So why is it easy to find PRO "Flat Earth videos", but NOT for "Moon Landing Hoax"
In my view, there is a distinct difference between the two -- the first one, Flat Earth, is FALSE, and therefore not a threat to our government and societal world view. The 2nd one -- is different.
And so, it's TRUE that for this forum to be NEUTRAL would work AGAINST NASA...
This is catastrophically poor reasoning. As usual, you have reached a conclusion, sought any scrap of support for it, no matter how flimsy, discarded anything that doesn't confirm your assumptions, and proceeded to base even worse conclusions on that initial assumption.
No Gish Gallop, because Gish Gallop relies upon NOT REACHING A CONCLUSION -- making a claim, but then changing the subject with intent of NEVER resolving the claim you made -- leaving some viewers with ONLY ONE SIDE OF THE CLAIM, never cross-examined to conclusion. We've completed this thread. Conclusion and CONSENSUS has been reached -- there is no longer ANYONE HERE who believes this "Lunar Launch Too Fast" claim holds weight to prove a hoax. No one.
We'll add Gish Gallop to the increasingly extensive list of things you don't understand. You haven't made 5 separate claims. You've made the single claim that the Moon landings were faked. You've introduced 5 separate threads that you believe are evidence of that claim. Each time you are cornered in one, you attempt to redirect to one that you mistakenly believe gives you surer footing. Your interest in presenting more poorly vetted evidence (which is also likely riddled with errors) is part of the Gish Gallop technique.
You continue to insist you're being mistreated, but you have failed at every step of the way to engage with any degree of honesty or integrity. I've suggested to you multiple times that you need to enter into discussions like these with far more preparation than you've been willing to do. You have ignored me every time and continued, essentially, saying "Apollo was hoax, prove me wrong!"
Your attitude and unwillingness to engage according to the rules of intellectual discourse are the problem. If you want to be treated differently, correct your behavior.
