The above Stellarium screenshot has been pointed out to the little doggy. He has dismissed it, because he has this idea that Stellarium references the horizon in the picture, not the true horizon. He's absolutely deluded in that, because all the scenery consists of is a png file. There's nothing in it for the software to reference other than it's location on the lunar surface. The figures it is quoting are from a datum. The standard issue of Stellarium (as I pointed out earlier) has the Apollo 17 site incorrectly plotted and it will still give the same values as the one in my corrected model.
He has never used the software, and has no idea how it works. Just to please him, however, here's exactly the same location and date with zero landscape.
He's also claimed that there are functions in the LRO's quickmap that can show the Earth in the lunar sky, and that it shows Earth at 70 degrees,
It does not. You can display an image of Earth with data describing its location, but it doesn't place it in the correct location.
Here's a snip from a recording I made of Taurus Littrow with the date set at the Apollo 17 EVA, and with the Earth showing. The elevation angle is blurry, but it is very definitely around 44 degrees. It's kind of ironic that straydog02 is putting such faith in the accuracy and fidelity of the LRO when elsewhere he's claiming it's all faked.
Fetch doggy, fetch.
