I saw that post (made a copy in case it disappeared), but haven't commented, I don't really see the point in drumming it in.
It is curious that is took someone pointing out that the commentator referenced players who weren't in the same team together until 1969, and even then there was push back, for Jarrah to finally do some due diligence. Classic confirmation bias, that we must all be aware of, in that he has found the first clip, and stopped there, since it confirmed his preconceived notions. What probably should have been done was to find other sources that supported the first.
Still, it is what it is, and another hoax claim continues to crumble.
But yeah, that last comment is the true level of his "integrity".