I still have no intention of sharing my opinions on scenario for shooting JFK with this forum.
You can think that you don't deserve to hear them and you might be correct, but my reason is, why bother.
Actually, that's
not what I think. I think you won't "share" because you do not feel confident that you can defend any specific proposition. It's easy to play with "anomalies" here and there; much more difficult to say "
this is what I think happened, and here's my evidence".
But I would sincerely want to know - if you feel "why bother?" about actually discussing your ideas, why are you bothering to post at all? Even starting a new thread, which I'm sure will contain nothing significantly different from your previous one.
Is there a logic behind "Here, I'd like to talk about JFK. Except I won't actually say anything, except to say you're all wrong"? I would think if you really have a burning desire to talk about the assassination, you'd
want to tell us your theories.