The whole world is not wrong.
Correct. The whole world is not wrong. The aerospace engineering community, and the planetary scientists, and the astronomers using spaceborne instruments, and the operators and insurers of communications satellites, and freshman physics students who can correctly formulate an energy balance, are not wrong.
You are wrong. Your kinetic energy calculation is fundamentally wrong because you are comparing
two different systems, and this has been explained to you in excruciating detail and using the simplest possible example - which immediately shows that your version produces a nonsensical result. The only question is whether your failure to grasp this is the result of (a) complete inability to learn, (b) refusal to acknowledge an error, or (c) outright trolling.
Only Apollo 11 is SF.
Is this an admission that you accept the reality of the other Apollo missions (and Mercury and Gemini and Soyuz and Shenzhou and Skylab and Salyut and Mir and ISS and Cygnus and Genesis and etc.)? Or that you were simply unaware of the other missions' existence? Or that you are simply unable to keep track of your claims? Or that you are simply trolling?
And the purpose of my serious Challenge - topic here (not started by me) - is not deceive but encourage creative thinking by offering money,
You do not have the money you claim to offer; that is an outright fabrication. You are of course able to rebut this by providing
evidence for the existence of your mythical million Euros. But you don't have it, so you can't and won't.
2. show how any manned space ship manages to visit Moon (or Mars) while overpowering gravity forces and finally getting back to Earth in one piece incl. fuel used.
Already shown, with voluminous references supplied - the existence of which you were ignorant, and the provision of which you have pretended never happened. Your "challenge" is not serious; it is a sham no different than the $10,000 or $1,000,000 "challenges" routinely offered by crackpots across the Web.
...many people also saw 1969 Apollo 11 take off from Earth, some blury B&W footage of people on the Moon and splash down in the Pacific five days later live on TV ... but what happened in between the three events?
Days of operations, telemetry, still and motion imagery, sample collection, tracking and telemetry - The same as happened on the
other Apollo missions, eight of which went to the Moon and five of which landed on it. All extensively documented in thousands of engineering reports and scientific papers, much of which is freely available and in fact nowadays easily found with a casual Web search. The fact that
you are ignorant of it is no excuse, and your appeal to ignorance reflects only on
your ignorance.
Then how?
Asked and answered.
Those are my two Challenges. No big deal.
Correct. The one is off-topic for this subforum, the other is simply empty bluster.
Plenty of people suggesting I am broke,
Deliberate misrepresentation. No one has suggested you are broke. We are simply pointing out that you don't have a million Euros to offer for your "challenge", and that said "challenge" is therefore phony.
I recommend posters to focus on topic and not divert from it.
Not only is it on topic, as has been repeatedly explained to you, but
you are the only one attempting to divert from it by throwing out strawmen such as the "broke" claim. Don't think for a minute that you are fooling anyone by such tactics. You are not the first conspiracist to try laying down such smokescreens.
Kindly stop dodging
the serious problems with your claims I brought to your attention in reply #558:
1. You are offering money you don't have, for a challenge you have defined poorly - and redefined - and has no proper adjudication.
2. Your primary calculation is completely wrong because you don't understand energy balances. Your errors have been explained to you in excruciating detail, yet you refuse to acknowledge them.
3. You have no idea what you are talking about, and no apparent interest or ability in relieving your own ignorance.In light of these issues, I ask again - do you have any intention of actually learning anything at all, or are you just trolling?
I will continue to press these issues until you address them in a realistic manner.. You may ignore them, but you cannot run away from them. If you continue to deliberately avoid these challenges, I will consider that your admission of trolling, and into the bit-bucket you will go.
ETA: fixed close parenthesis
