Because we find the Apollo missions interesting and amazing and like talking about them.
Me too, but I wondered not about that, I wonder about the energy put in the debunking.
If discussing the historical facts and examining the engineering technology is "attacking" in your world, then I don't know what to tell you.
I wonder how you manage to get this confused with debunking. I see the debunking, and it is totally something else then discussing the historical facts and examining the engineering technology.
So please answer the question of the why of debunking itself, what is in it for you?
We do not attack - we defend against libellous and slanderous claims, we point out the errors and deliberate misinformation.
OK, but why would individuals have to do that, could NASA not do that? You would have more time for your hobby of Apollo itself?
I really cannot imagine people doing that, other than those paid to do it.
What you can or cannot imagine has no bearing on fact.
By your logic, no-one would ever have a hobby because they weren't being paid for it. Learning about Apollo is one of my hobbies.
The separation of the hobby and the debunking should make you see the logic, and raise the question anew
I am not paranoid, I do not see the "brainwashing" etc that you claim simply because it isn't there. I have plenty of scientific and historical knowledge, as well as logic and critical thinking skills, to examine the evidence and conclude that Apollo happened as presented in the historical record.
Well, that is what I would like to challenge, I hope your thinking capabilities will prevent you from bashing and enter the questions and answers I have.
For a starter: To not see the brainwashing I claim there is, 'because it is not there', is not the convincing argument for me. I hope you can see that in logic 'it is not because it is not' cannot be.
Then, I think there is an analogy between the former Nazi doctrines and the US doctrines of this moment. There were intelligent people there, they succeeded in forming a logical system, the 'truth' according to their believe sytem. In the US is the 'homeland security' doctrine the same, and I think in the Apollo era a similar doctrine was happening in the Nasa circles. That should give some clues about the historical perspective, maybe it rings some bells?
I note that you have presented no evidence, nor shown how you have drawn your "conclusions". All you have done is launch insults.
I am really sorry that you could see insults in my post, I really don't do this. See, that is why I suspect some Nasa officials behind your identities, it is simply too strange what you say.
Why would you want to see insults in it??
Using your worldview as discussed above, I could claim that you are being paid to spread such claims...
I challenge you to find out, I told I would not lie, so you could use that to see what it is all about.