When will the loons start to claim that Chang’e 3 is a hoax?

[carpediem]

I can't wait to hear what Hunchbacked, Jarrah White and all their sycophants have to say about this...

https://www.youtube.com/user/hunchbacked/discussion

hunchbacked
1 day ago
 
+Kris de Valle
There is no chinese rover on the moon.


Looks like HB is going for it's a fake too.

[Dalhousie]

I'm just wondering... have any of the HB crowd ever come up with a design of what a lunar lander should look like?  Most of them still seem to be stuck on the old von Braun giant surface-to-surface rocket.

If you wanted a retro aesthetic you could chose between a giant streamlined tail-sitter (a la Tintin, Disney, Destination Moon, and a hundred SF movies, programs and book/magazine covers) or an early von Braun (giant unstreamlined tail-sitter).  So maybe they really do expect something like these

http://www.yesterland.com/moonrocket.html

http://www.allposters.com/-sp/Scientist-Wernher-Von-Braun-with-Model-of-Moon-Rocket-He-Designed-Posters_i5170001_.htm

http://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/lunarlan.html

http://gamedesignreviews.com/scrapbook/tintin-on-the-moon/

http://horrornews.net/48665/film-review-destination-moon-1950/

Of course if they were clever (an oxymoron, I know), they could use a horizontal lander, which is an excellent configuration for large landers with heavy payloads.

http://timzero4.deviantart.com/art/SPACE-1999-EAGLE-BLENDER-3D-176507235

[Luke Pemberton]

I couldn't help but notice how today's photos show non-parallel shadows. That raises an intersting question to the HB crowd who want the Yutu to discredit Apollo. Also where the hell is the blast crater??

Sorry to resurrect a 4 month old post, but hasn't He Who Shall Not Be Named used the Chang'e 3 data to 'discredit' Apollo, where the former shows no blast crater and parallel shadows. Invoke one argument for Apollo but not the other. Geeze!

[bknight]

I loved the YouTube video by BertieSlack .

[BazBear]

I couldn't help but notice how today's photos show non-parallel shadows. That raises an intersting question to the HB crowd who want the Yutu to discredit Apollo. Also where the hell is the blast crater??

Sorry to resurrect a 4 month old post, but hasn't He Who Shall Not Be Named used the Chang'e 3 data to 'discredit' Apollo, where the former shows no blast crater and parallel shadows. Invoke one argument for Apollo but not the other. Geeze!

Ya gotta love the a la carte approach to conspiracy theorism! The handiest part is, if later on if HWSNBN wants to discredit Chang'e 3, I suspect he'll have no qualms about using NASA data to do so! Win-Win!

[bknight]

I couldn't help but notice how today's photos show non-parallel shadows. That raises an intersting question to the HB crowd who want the Yutu to discredit Apollo. Also where the hell is the blast crater??

Sorry to resurrect a 4 month old post, but hasn't He Who Shall Not Be Named used the Chang'e 3 data to 'discredit' Apollo, where the former shows no blast crater and parallel shadows. Invoke one argument for Apollo but not the other. Geeze!

HWSNBN(good coin) used the rover's particle x-ray spectrometer readings indicating a different composition than that of Apollo moon rocks.  I won't print the percentages but they are there to look at.  I've not done a comparison, but maybe someone else has looked at the comparison and can post results.

[Dalhousie]

I couldn't help but notice how today's photos show non-parallel shadows. That raises an intersting question to the HB crowd who want the Yutu to discredit Apollo. Also where the hell is the blast crater??

Sorry to resurrect a 4 month old post, but hasn't He Who Shall Not Be Named used the Chang'e 3 data to 'discredit' Apollo, where the former shows no blast crater and parallel shadows. Invoke one argument for Apollo but not the other. Geeze!

HWSNBN(good coin) used the rover's particle x-ray spectrometer readings indicating a different composition than that of Apollo moon rocks.  I won't print the percentages but they are there to look at.  I've not done a comparison, but maybe someone else has looked at the comparison and can post results.

He expects rocks 1000 km away from the nearest Apollo site to have the same composition?

[bknight]

In his perverted mind, the fact that a difference exist "proves" his contention that Apollo "was" a hoax.  Only critical evaluation of the data would allow for differences to exist.  From listening to many videos, not just YT, I have the understanding Oxygen isotope ratios is similar.  I'm not sure the lander had the ability to measure this commonality.

[Dalhousie]

In his perverted mind, the fact that a difference exist "proves" his contention that Apollo "was" a hoax.  Only critical evaluation of the data would allow for differences to exist.  From listening to many videos, not just YT, I have the understanding Oxygen isotope ratios is similar.  I'm not sure the lander had the ability to measure this commonality.

Yutu carries a APX, so will provide whole rock chemsitry data only.  There should be a diversity of compositions, as the landing site is close to the  boundary between high and low Ti mare basalts, and there is highland material not that far away.  There have been a couple of papers, I will see if I can find them when I am next at a good library (the only Yutu paper I have is the very nice one on the GPR).  There is also an IR spectrometer, providing mineralogy.

[BertieSlack]

I loved the YouTube video by BertieSlack .

Thanks, but it pretty much wrote itself. There's some interesting Chang'e 3 news news from La-La Land. The moon hoax theory's champion idiot, Expattaffy1, has just claimed that Chang'e 3 was faked...........by NASA. Apparently this was done to trick the world into believing that landing on the moon is possible at all.

[bknight]

I loved the YouTube video by BertieSlack .

Thanks, but it pretty much wrote itself. There's some interesting Chang'e 3 news news from La-La Land. The moon hoax theory's champion idiot, Expattaffy1, has just claimed that Chang'e 3 was faked...........by NASA. Apparently this was done to trick the world into believing that landing on the moon is possible at all.

I haven't seen this one, but it would fit his perverted half-mind(thanks to Abaddon).
ETA:
Are you still thinking of a video concerning the metadata information?

[BertieSlack]

Are you still thinking of a video concerning the metadata information?

I've got a video in production that will mention it. I'd like to get your opinion before I upload, so I'll post it unlisted when it's ready. I should be posting a quick video about Taffy's Chang'e 3 claim tonight.

[bknight]

Are you still thinking of a video concerning the metadata information?

I've got a video in production that will mention it. I'd like to get your opinion before I upload, so I'll post it unlisted when it's ready. I should be posting a quick video about Taffy's Chang'e 3 claim tonight.

Let me know, you have my address.

[onebigmonkey]

He expects rocks 1000 km away from the nearest Apollo site to have the same composition?

So wait, China finds a rock type that is slightly different to the Apollo ones and this is proof that there aren't any Apollo ones for them to work out a difference?

And NASA did this? Man are they getting sloppy...