I am delighted you have received the book and clearly have enjoyed reading it from cover to cover.
Are you reading the same review I am? Your book is excruciating. It's pompous, poorly-written, and clearly a fabrication. The fact that you're selling it for money borders on outright fraud.
You are telling your pro Apollo colleagues how interesting the book must be.
No, I'm telling them to avoid it at all costs. And I will be doing the same thing very shortly on Amazon.com.
I was not evaluating it for "interest." I was evaluating it for accuracy -- of which there is none. However, if I were evaluating it for interest I would give it even lower marks. It's a tedious recitation of your irrelevant biographical details, fatally burdened by lengthy egotistical excursions into your accountancy career. You don't even posit a credible or complete hoax theory.
In your case of course you have the added bonus of having learned something new- furthering your education about Space flight which seemed to be sadly lacking.
Utter nonsense. You demonstrate practically no correct understanding of space flight, and your claims to have acquired it are so fraught with obvious inconsistencies as to be comical. And I dare you to stick around here and attempt to prove how expert you really are. Understand that here your knowledge about space engineering and the history of space exploration will be challenged vigorously by a number of career professional engineers including myself. My guess is that you will not accept that challenge.
All your facts seem to be based on computer simulations handed out to you by NASA.
No. My facts are based on practicing aerospace engineering professionally for 25 years and being a recognized expert in the history of Apollo. You are welcome to test your knowledge against mine any time you wish. However, you may not simply declare your critics to be uninformed.
I hope you have now had the courage to ring David Chin and get confirmation from him...
You haven't told me what exactly you expected Chin to confirm. You apparently didn't tell him anything about your claims of playing there in 1969, or about your visits from ghosts. I will certainly call him once you tell me what you expect him to say. But so far all you insinuate is that you met him and had your picture taken with him. There's no point to confirming such an irrelevant detail.
...and then realise that you have been wrong about Apollo for all these years. Jockndoris
No, I'm certain I am
not wrong. You haven't even done rudimentary research into Apollo, or space engineering in general. Your story can't even stay consistent between two consecutive pages. The details in your book are so comically non-NASA they don't even qualify as credible fiction.
