Bob,
Yes, using the AE8MAX table again, I input energy levels of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Adding those values for earth radii = 3.0, (which was the largest), I get a flux total of about 4.39E7. That seems consistent with the diagram. (As opposed to an error factor of 3 million!)
I noticed that the diagram shows the most intense region farther out, like 4 earth radii, but that's on the tail side. So I suppose those values are averaged out for all the way around the earth where the belts compress more and more toward the planet on the sun side.
No word yet from Sigma Xi. I really do expect them to address this.
My last couple of comments on the NVIDIA/JW thread plus my three re-posts seem to have killed the thread! No comments have been posted since I did them 12 hours ago.