Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?

[Chief]

Looks like Romulus has an odd infatuation with Jay and Phil.

Are they the enemy Rommy? Are you trying to get them?

[Romulus]

Armstrong wrote and spoke extensively about his experiences on the Moon.

That is simply not true. Armstrong was a recluse who appeared to be highly reluctant to represent NASA, and he very seldom spoke of being on the moon. He has however made several comments that many interpret as cryptic confessions that it was a hoax. Site a reference to Armstrong pontificating about the moonlandings

[DD Brock]

I understand... I am not just another poster here like Windley said he was. I am in his and your house.

No.  This is LunarOrbit's forum.  I participate in it on exactly the same footing as you do.

You GOTTA be kidding!

Phil Plait runs this forum and you and he have the identical same job description and objectives. I wonder just who you think you're fooling. this is why you have zero credibility as far as I am concerned. This is a WHOPPER

Careful, Bub. Your Expert Scientist facade is beginning to show serious cracks...

[Romulus]

Looks like Romulus has an odd infatuation with Jay and Phil.

Are they the enemy Rommy? Are you trying to get them?

WTF is   "Rommy"?

Put down the crack pipe

[Chief]

Rommy, it's a term of endearment my little cherub.

[Romulus]

I understand... I am not just another poster here like Windley said he was. I am in his and your house.

No.  This is LunarOrbit's forum.  I participate in it on exactly the same footing as you do.

You GOTTA be kidding!

Phil Plait runs this forum and you and he have the identical same job description and objectives. I wonder just who you think you're fooling. this is why you have zero credibility as far as I am concerned. This is a WHOPPER

Careful, Bub. Your Expert Scientist facade is beginning to show serious cracks...

And just how is that? By being right again?

[Romulus]

Rommy, it's a term of endearment my little cherub.

You sound a bit "off" in the head to me. It's no wonder you're affiliated with this crowd

[DD Brock]

Armstrong wrote and spoke extensively about his experiences on the Moon.

That is simply not true. Armstrong was a recluse who appeared to be highly reluctant to represent NASA, and he very seldom spoke of being on the moon. He has however made several comments that many interpret as cryptic confessions that it was a hoax. Site a reference to Armstrong pontificating about the moonlandings

Clearly you never saw his outstanding key note speach at the 40th anniversary of Apollo 11

[DD Brock]

I understand... I am not just another poster here like Windley said he was. I am in his and your house.

No.  This is LunarOrbit's forum.  I participate in it on exactly the same footing as you do.

You GOTTA be kidding!

Phil Plait runs this forum and you and he have the identical same job description and objectives. I wonder just who you think you're fooling. this is why you have zero credibility as far as I am concerned. This is a WHOPPER

Careful, Bub. Your Expert Scientist facade is beginning to show serious cracks...

And just how is that? By being right again?

Yeah, that must be it....

[JayUtah]

That is simply not true. Armstrong was a recluse who appeared to be highly reluctant to represent NASA, and he very seldom spoke of being on the moon.

That's according to one conspiracy author who complained that Armstrong was reluctant to see him.

Site a reference to Armstrong pontificating about the moonlandings

The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.

[Romulus]

Rommy, it's a term of endearment my little cherub.

I believe you're a 'sock puppet' for another user here, probably Windley. You want to be able to say things that support him but do not degrade his credibility any worst than it already has been. 14 posts? You registered the account to attack me.

[JayUtah]

14 posts? You registered the account to attack me.

A fact you could easily have checked by reading all 14 posts.  But you didn't.

[DD Brock]

Rommy, it's a term of endearment my little cherub.

I believe you're a 'sock puppet' for another user here, probably Windley. You want to be able to say things that support him but do not degrade his credibility any worst than it already has been. 14 posts? You registered the account to attack me.

Yeah, he registered two months ago in anticipation of the gem of a thread JUST to attack you.

Facade still cracking......

[JayUtah]

He has however made several comments that many interpret as cryptic confessions that it was a hoax.

All made possible by the fact that it's remarkably easy to find examples where he talked about having been to the Moon.

[Romulus]

That is simply not true. Armstrong was a recluse who appeared to be highly reluctant to represent NASA, and he very seldom spoke of being on the moon.

That's according to one conspiracy author who complained that Armstrong was reluctant to see him.

Site a reference to Armstrong pontificating about the moonlandings

The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.

Mr. Windley, you will have to excuse me for being blunt, but you are a horrible liar. The "surface journal" was required to be attributed to Armstrong because if it didn't exist the hoax would be obvious. Armstrong resigned from NASA a few years after the 'moonlandings" and refused to discuss the moon landings with ANYONE. He was virtual recluse who valued his privacy and when he did make public appearances he didn't discuss Apollo. He worked as a professor and didn't allow his students to treat him any different than anyone else. He abhorred the attention and showed all the signs of being a man with integrity unwilling to participate in a lie.