I don't have a whole lot of time to respond ATM as I am busy doing the same thing you are here, trying to make a living.
By 'here' are you suggesting that we make money by posting on this forum? I seek clarification of this statement.
You're right, I believe if all of the evidence originates with once source and that source is a proven liar that evidence has to be scrutinized carefully and methodically, which is what I have done.
So present the evidence of your scrutiny for us all to see.
I also believe the evidence NASA provides itself can be used to prove a negative because it so well documented, and when you document something that didn't really happen of this scope your make thousands, probably millions of mistakes. And an individual like myself can systematically pick that evidence apart, not in just certain areas, but nearly all of it.
Cite examples where there are mistakes. If you want to invoke the 'scientific method' then you must present your evidence. You are making the affirmative claim, the burden rests with you.
I agree with you that I am in the minority with my conclusions as they relate to the Apollo project.
There is a reason that you are in the minority. Maybe you should think about this.
I tested all of my arguments against the best NASA had to offer, and what I found was that there was a consistent pervasive pattern, many people would post simultaneously trying to overtax my abilities to respond and the conversation was directed or steered away from the evidence and subject, and on to my own credibility and scientific aptitude, as well as my integrity and in many cases sanity
What scientific aptitude. I see no evidence for such claims. I see a lot of bluster.
Just as you have done here. It is very predictable. And because you are so predictable you are very easy to expose.
What did you expect? This is our house and we are all members of this forum, under the moderation of LO. We are all entitled to post. That is your problem, not ours.
