tarkus.
The Apollo programme is a FACT
That they sent men to the moon and landed on it is a FACT
That they brought back hundreds of pounds of rocks and soil samples that could only have come from the moon... is a FACT
These FACTS are backed up by mountains of documentary evidence, engineering drawings, photographs, films and video, eyewitness accounts and personal testimonies at every stage of the programme, from the X-15 and X-1 programmes, through Mercury and Gemini to Apollo itself. These achievements are accepted as FACT by all of the world's leading astrophysicists, aerospace engineers, geologists, biologists and other scientists.
Therefore, Apollo has been proved beyond any doubt whatsoever, to have taken place exactly as stated by NASA, and that is THE most important aspect in all of this. NASA explained exactly how they were going to do each part of the programme, and then did it in the full glare of the public eye; failures and all. Therefore, in order to disprove these established facts, THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS UPON THE HOAX BELIEVER!!!
So lets look at what the few hoax believers out there have done to prove their case.
NOT ONE HOAX BELIEVER, not Jack White, not Sibrel, not Fetzer, not Rene, not Kaysing, and not certainly not The Blunder from Down Under, has ever put forward a comprehensive, documented account of how the hoax was perpetrated. Yes, we hear spurious comments about shadow anomalies and waving flags and film studios in the Nevada desert and starless skies and c-rocks and slow motion cameras and other such ignorant, multiply debunked rantings but where is the comprehensive documentary account of exactly how it was all done?
Where exactly was the film studio located?
What types of movie cameras did they use?
Exactly how were the scenes lit?
What happened to the camera crews and other production staff?
What type of film did they use and where and how was it processed?
Who was responsible for all the alterations to the photos (given there was no "Photoshop" in 1969)?
Where did the Apollo rockets go if not to the moon?
How were they able to fake the signals coming from the direction of the moon as established by independent witnesses?
How were they able to fake lunar gravity in a vacuum?
How were they able to store hours upon hours of continuous video?
How do they account for all the new lunar surface photos showing human activity at the sites?
How do they account for LLR which actually required someone to go to the moon to install and align the equipment?
How do they account for hundreds of pounds of rocks and samples brought back that can only have come from the Moon?
How can they explain that of over 400,000 people involved, NOT ONE has ever blown the whistle?
Where is the money coming from to pay for this ongoing conspiracy (even Black Project budgets have Congressional oversight!)?
How do they reconcile the apparent cleverness and brilliance of NASA in perpetrating a the lunar landing hoax on the world for over 40 years, with them being too careless to notice the C-Rock, waving flags and other alleged photographic anomalies?
All of these questions need to be answered by hoax believers, WITH PROOF, before anyone can begin to take anything they say seriously. It is not enough for them to say that they "think" the lunar gravity and vacuum was faked in a vacuum chamber with slow motion filming.... you have to PROVE which vacuum chamber was used, PROVE where it is located, PROVE how the filming was actually done. In other words , they will be held to the same standard of proof that NASA hold themselves to; no more, and no less.
