Author Topic: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.  (Read 667974 times)

Offline Luke Pemberton

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Chaos in his tin foil hat
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #885 on: September 03, 2015, 05:47:52 PM »
Here's a video of a UK TV presenter/journalist going into a vacuum chamber.

That's great. I like the part with the water. What do you think to that Neil? Let's recall, one of your original claims was testing a sublimator would destroy the integrity of the vacuum, but yet we demonstrably observe in this video that the 'vacuum' was maintained despite the 'boiling' water. Such is this gish gallop, Neil has changed horses with his ideas of testing the PLSS in a vacuum.

Original horse: A sublimator test would put strain on the vacuum pumps.
New horse: The PLSS and sublimator should have been tested in a vacuum.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2015, 05:53:15 PM by Luke Pemberton »
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein.

I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people – Sir Isaac Newton.

A polar orbit would also bypass the SAA - Tim Finch

Offline bknight

  • Neptune
  • ****
  • Posts: 3136
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #886 on: September 03, 2015, 05:50:12 PM »

Neither do you.
But we could PROVE it.
On Earth.
Today.
Would you volunteer to wear the spacesuit in a vacuum chamber?

Why yes I can prove that parts of Surveyor were returned after photography of the lander.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveyor_3
Truth needs no defense.  Nobody can take those footsteps I made on the surface of the moon away from me.
Eugene Cernan

Offline Abaddon

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1132
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #887 on: September 03, 2015, 05:53:08 PM »
I know this is off-topic
Yes. Yes it is indeed off topic. It is becoming you signature pattern. Keep it up and members will start reporting you to the mod.

but you might want to change your avatar because every time I read your comments I read them as if Butters were reading them. It's hilarious.
So? Every time I see yours I think "Oh, this crackpot".

As for the definition of stress in the context in which it was used, I mean psychological stress of being in a potentially dangerous environment.
That is what test pilots do for a living. What of it?

I suspect pulse and rate of breathing would be monitored.
Wait...WHAT? They were continuously monitored. IT was the Flight Surgeons frakkin job to monitor that data. How in seven hells do you not know this?

Hyperventilation while in orbit and possibly passing out would probably be very bad in orbit.
Why? Once you have established orbit, you can go for a nap if you like because Newton is in the driving seat. Or loose consciousness if you prefer, Newton is still in the driving seat. You seem to have some fantasy concept that they had to fly seat of the pants, teeth gritted with sweaty brow, grimly clasping a joystick whilst their life depended upon not a moments inattention. Twasn't so, m'laddie buck. On Apollo, they pretty much kept the same schedule with all three astronauts sleeping at the same time.

Best to test and train for it in a vacuum chamber on Earth first.
Apart from critical phases they spent the vast majority of their time in shirt sleeves and zero G. How a vacuum chamber on Earth might be useful is anyones guess.

Ain't no 9-11 in orbit.
Off topic red herring. You really like those.

Offline Neil Baker

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #888 on: September 03, 2015, 05:58:50 PM »

Why yes I can prove that parts of Surveyor were returned after photography of the lander.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveyor_3

Returned from where? And how do you know from where they were returned?


Offline Neil Baker

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #889 on: September 03, 2015, 06:01:24 PM »
Here's a video of a UK TV presenter/journalist going into a vacuum chamber.

That's great. I like the part with the water. What do you think to that Neil? Let's recall, one of your original claims was testing a sublimator would destroy the integrity of the vacuum, but yet we demonstrably observe in this video that the 'vacuum' was maintained despite the 'boiling' water. Such is this gish gallop, Neil has changed horses with his ideas of testing the PLSS in a vacuum.

Original horse: A sublimator test would put strain on the vacuum pumps.
New horse: The PLSS and sublimator should have been tested in a vacuum.

It's obviously not high vacuum.
Notice the attendants with eyes and skin exposed.
Better luck next time.

Offline Luke Pemberton

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Chaos in his tin foil hat
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #890 on: September 03, 2015, 06:02:54 PM »
It is becoming you signature pattern. Keep it up and members will start reporting you to the mod.

Yes, little off topic remark, let the thread run and then change horse in attempt to crawl from previous hole that was dug. Gish gallop.

Quote
So? Every time I see yours I think "Oh, this crackpot".

That's what I was going to say, or words to that effect.

I suspect pulse and rate of breathing would be monitored.
Wait...WHAT? They were continuously monitored. IT was the Flight Surgeons frakkin job to monitor that data. How in seven hells do you not know this?

Ah, those parts in Apollo 13 have confused me for years. You mean to say they had a surgeon on the flight team. I just thought that was Hollywood.  ;)


On Apollo, they pretty much kept the same schedule with all three astronauts sleeping at the same time.

Gene Cernan spoke about this, and how they tried to keep their normal earth routines.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein.

I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people – Sir Isaac Newton.

A polar orbit would also bypass the SAA - Tim Finch

Offline Apollo 957

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 182
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #891 on: September 03, 2015, 06:09:47 PM »

Why yes I can prove that parts of Surveyor were returned after photography of the lander.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveyor_3

Returned from where? And how do you know from where they were returned?

From the Moon. The post-recovery report that was posted earlier, which you seem to have ignored or not noticed, confirms this.

Offline Apollo 957

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 182
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #892 on: September 03, 2015, 06:11:09 PM »
Here's a video of a UK TV presenter/journalist going into a vacuum chamber.

That's great. I like the part with the water. What do you think to that Neil? Let's recall, one of your original claims was testing a sublimator would destroy the integrity of the vacuum, but yet we demonstrably observe in this video that the 'vacuum' was maintained despite the 'boiling' water. Such is this gish gallop, Neil has changed horses with his ideas of testing the PLSS in a vacuum.

Original horse: A sublimator test would put strain on the vacuum pumps.
New horse: The PLSS and sublimator should have been tested in a vacuum.

It's obviously not high vacuum.
Notice the attendants with eyes and skin exposed.
Better luck next time.

You mean the attendants outside the chamber? Or those going in and out when preparing for the test, or escorting the subject out after it's completed?

Offline bknight

  • Neptune
  • ****
  • Posts: 3136
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #893 on: September 03, 2015, 06:12:41 PM »

Returned from where? And how do you know from where they were returned?
Well flight and telemetry data indicate the vehicle travelled to the Moon and landed, three times if you read the article, took images of the surrounding area and sample the soil strength leading to manned landings on the Moon.  Then Apollo 12 followed some three years later.  http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/missions/apollo/apollo_12/
As witnesses, I have no particular names but several including myself watched the Saturn V lift the craft into LEO.  The mission included a more precise landing than A11, which was accomplished near the Surveyor crater.  Images came be found at http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/frame.html.  Pete and Alan used their sublimators on two EVA's, one to the Surveyor 3 site, at which photos were taken.  Upon lift off  Intrepid rendezvous with Yankee Clipper rock samples and Surveyor parts are transferred to the CSM.   The CSM returns to the earth where the samples end up at JSC. You may view all the flight paths of the mission, the images and the transcripts all at the linked site.
Truth needs no defense.  Nobody can take those footsteps I made on the surface of the moon away from me.
Eugene Cernan

Offline Abaddon

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1132
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #894 on: September 03, 2015, 06:16:44 PM »
It's obviously not high vacuum.
Airlocks. What are they for?

Notice the attendants with eyes and skin exposed.
Still haven't figured out the concept of airlocks, I see. The clue is in the name.

Better luck next time.
Try reading the material provided next time.

Offline JayUtah

  • Neptune
  • ****
  • Posts: 3814
    • Clavius
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #895 on: September 03, 2015, 06:18:10 PM »
But we could PROVE it.
On Earth.

We already have.  You just refuse to consider it because you want to trump up a controversy.
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams

Offline Luke Pemberton

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Chaos in his tin foil hat
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #896 on: September 03, 2015, 06:44:26 PM »
Newton is still in the driving seat.

I like that line in Apollo 13. It really sums up orbital mechanics. So many CTs think it is like driving a car.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein.

I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people – Sir Isaac Newton.

A polar orbit would also bypass the SAA - Tim Finch

Offline Abaddon

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1132
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #897 on: September 03, 2015, 07:07:13 PM »
Newton is still in the driving seat.

I like that line in Apollo 13. It really sums up orbital mechanics. So many CTs think it is like driving a car.
Indeed.

There are many hoax luddites who really believe that it was necessary to blast the engines at full throttle all the way to the moon, therefore it must be a hoax as it is not possible to carry so much fuel. I kid you not. Some people really think that it was necessary to burn the whole way to the moon and back

Offline Luke Pemberton

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Chaos in his tin foil hat
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #898 on: September 03, 2015, 07:11:33 PM »
There are many hoax luddites who really believe that it was necessary to blast the engines at full throttle all the way to the moon, therefore it must be a hoax as it is not possible to carry so much fuel. I kid you not. Some people really think that it was necessary to burn the whole way to the moon and back

...and of course Jarrah with his theory that Apollo 13 didn't have enough fuel to return to Earth until it was pointed out to him that it didn't need to burn the same amount of fuel as the other Apollo missions, as it was on a FRT and not required to enter lunar orbit (I'm not referring to the Mod).
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein.

I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people – Sir Isaac Newton.

A polar orbit would also bypass the SAA - Tim Finch

Offline gillianren

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 2211
    • My Letterboxd journal
Re: Why I suspect Apollo was a hoax.
« Reply #899 on: September 03, 2015, 07:20:42 PM »

Amazing to see Charlie Brown close up. I've taken some pictures of the heat shield (what's left of it anyway). For those that are UK based, the Science Museum has a Cosmonaut Exhibition opening in a couple of weeks.

If some can PM me the code to display the images at the correct width, I'll save them as JPEG and load them to the Reality of Apollo section. Thanks in advance.
Cool.  Not having visited on, is the hatch covered by Plexiglas and the interior viewed through it?

The one I saw years ago was completely covered in Plexiglas, with an open hatch.
"This sounds like a job for Bipolar Bear . . . but I just can't seem to get out of bed!"

"Conspiracy theories are an irresistible labour-saving device in the face of complexity."  --Henry Louis Gates