Go to Kip Teague's Apollo Image Gallery
http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.htmland click on Apollo 10, where there are four photos in a row which show the effect of CSM tilt (relative to the moon) on the amount of moon reflected in the front of the CM. Note that HiRes copies can be downloaded of all but the first, and the fourth photo is similar to the one on the page linked in post 1. In the fourth, the angle of the camera's lens axis to the CM might have a bearing on how much moon is reflected -- I've never experimented with reflections off a cone.
Click on the frame number at far left to get the thumbnail at upper centre, then click on that to get a medium-sized photo, or on the Hi-Res button to get the biggest:--
AS10-27-3856 – CSM tilted down – more moon reflected
AS10-27-3872 – CSM tilted up – less moon reflected
AS10-27-3873 – CSM tilted up – less moon reflected
AS10-27-3881 – CSM tilted down – more moon reflected
One intriguing thing about that gallery is a new section of scans from entire rolls of film, and apparently taken from the original films, with both medium and hi-res. Sixty-four films have been done so far, but none for Apollo 10.
On looking at the translunar film for Apollo 11, there's no evidence of the "searing radiation hell" of the Van Halen belts,
but it's easy to see the result of the spacecraft moving around and away from Earth. I wonder what hoax-believers will have to say about that.