Tarkus is reposting it from someone else in the discussion. In irritation, I suspect, at being personally attacked. As it happens, I have reported a post for using the exact same tactics as he; seriously, people, having sex or not is not evidence of anything but whether or not you've had sex. Can we not go there?
That said, yes, Tarkus, you're ignorant. You're willfully ignorant, in fact. You are demonstrably ignorant because you don't want to learn. You don't want to learn because you think you know it all, and any time someone points out something that you don't know, you get mad. You'll notice that Jay has been corrected in this very thread and been gracious about it. He accepted the correction, because the person showed evidence that he was wrong. If you read around, you'll note that we all tend to do that. That's because everyone makes mistakes, and everyone is ignorant of something. That's okay; there's nothing wrong with that. What you're doing is wrong, because you are not correcting your ignorance, and you're getting mad at other people for not being as ignorant as you.
Seriously, let's consider something. Let's say you're right, and NASA has not only never sent a manned mission to the Moon, they've never even sent an unmanned mission to the Moon. Isn't it more logical to assume that the images of the far side of the Moon would always match, because they'd basically all be the same fake? It would take less work to have one mock-up of the far side to fake all the others from rather than making it up anew every time, wouldn't it?
