Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
The Hoax Theory / Re: Our favourite "Dr" turned up in a debate recently
« Last post by TimberWolfAu on July 13, 2024, 12:49:33 PM »
Got curious, emailed MCToon.

Apparently it's still on the books for 23 July, should be on Modern Day Debate again.
2
The Hoax Theory / Re: Our favourite "Dr" turned up in a debate recently
« Last post by TimberWolfAu on July 13, 2024, 03:46:07 AM »
Knew I'd seen a recent reference to the debate with Marcus, I Was just looking in the wrong spot.

https://mctoon.net/apollo-detectives/

Maybe I should send him the story on when Marcus had a met up with the BIS (British Interplanetary Society)?
3
The Hoax Theory / Re: Our favourite "Dr" turned up in a debate recently
« Last post by raven on July 12, 2024, 03:40:14 PM »
Like a pigeon declaring victory in chess because it defecated on the board, and the other player quit in disgust.
4
The Hoax Theory / Re: Our favourite "Dr" turned up in a debate recently
« Last post by onebigmonkey on July 12, 2024, 01:28:07 PM »
The defectives have long tried dictate terms in any kind of discussion, and then cry victory if people (quite reasonably) don't accede to their demands. Doesn't surprise me at all that Marcus would back out.
5
The Hoax Theory / Re: Our favourite "Dr" turned up in a debate recently
« Last post by TimberWolfAu on July 11, 2024, 09:08:46 PM »
MCTOON is doing a follow up debate in July, with Marcus “yes they did, oh wait no they didn’t land on the Moon” Allen. Does anybody have any links to specific ballistic tests carried out on the AL7 suits? As this is one of his question he will face. I can find references to ballistic tests but no actual documentation or images.

I'm not so sure this is actually happening now. Saw some posts from MCToon regarding getting the debate set up, and some of the back and forth was leaning towards that the Apollo Detectives wanted Toon to come to them, rather than a third party as he often does these days, and that they had questions, rather than they would be providing evidence of hoax. There didn't seem to be any actual replies/comments from Marcus though, so not sure what's happening with this one.

Will have a dig and see if I can find them again.
6
The Hoax Theory / Re: More hoax peddling by Hollywood?
« Last post by onebigmonkey on July 11, 2024, 04:27:50 AM »
Jarrah 'took one for the team' (his words on facebook). He was unimpressed, because it turns our they actually flew to the moon:

7
The Hoax Theory / Re: Our favourite "Dr" turned up in a debate recently
« Last post by onebigmonkey on July 09, 2024, 01:18:03 AM »
Rasa is the grift that keeps on giving. I say grift, that would imply that he knows the missions happened and is just in it for clicks and glory, but I do believe he is genuinely stupid.

There was this one time that he trumpeted loudly to his adoring audience that he had identified the building at Canon AFB used to film the landings. It was marked in blue on a map. We all know what blue on a map means, right? Well, he didn't, and he didn't realise it was an artificial lagoon (see the end of this
https://onebigmonkey.com/itburns/bartbs/bartsbull.html ).

I have a part of my site dedicated to quick debunks of stupid claims, and he makes up a hefty chunk of them.

His latest one is a classic. He claims that the Surveyor 3 images show telescopic tubing on the soil scoop arm used to retract and extend it. The Apollo images he's found seem to show a thin line. The reason for that is that it's a steel tape, and what seem to him to be joints in tubing are just markings on the tape. It's the same error people make with the PLSS blade aerials.

A couple of people have tried to reason with him and point out that no, it's a thin band and it's the viewing angle, and no, that's not how these type of pantograph arms work but he's having none of it.

His latest post on it is to urge people to download the Surveyor images as NASA are redacting them, which is just a flat out lie.

See the fun here:

https://onebigmonkey.com/itburns/bunker.html#Taped

He's somehow managed to convince people that he's an authority on the subject but he is absolutely clueless.
8
The Hoax Theory / Re: More hoax peddling by Hollywood?
« Last post by Dalhousie on July 08, 2024, 07:35:12 PM »
anyone prepared to take one for the team and watch this thing?
9
The Hoax Theory / Re: More hoax peddling by Hollywood?
« Last post by beedarko on July 08, 2024, 01:33:08 AM »
There are already numerous movies using faking the mission as a theme, this is just a bigger budget version.

And none of them can nullify the significance of Charlie Duke's simple, poignant comment at the end of this fantastic documentary:

10
The Hoax Theory / Re: More hoax peddling by Hollywood?
« Last post by onebigmonkey on July 07, 2024, 02:26:10 AM »
The loons are all over it already, simultaneously claiming that it's a dripfeed of the truth preparing the people for the ultimate revelation of a hoax, and yet another NASA sponsored hit job on conspiracy theorists.

There are already numerous movies using faking the mission as a theme, this is just a bigger budget version.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10