1
The Hoax Theory / Re: Watching the detectives...
« Last post by onebigmonkey on Today at 03:48:36 AM »The detectives are trying to backtrack from their claim, maybe they've seen my comment above, stating that they're just quoting a document produced in 2002, and that document doesn't identify where the flag is, and doesn't mention flag crater. They're just 'pointing out inconsistencies'
That's a lie, and I'm just pointing it out.
The document they fail to identify is this one:
https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1048/report.pdf
Page 28. It is absolutely the one they quote. The annotated map I identified as being from the PSR in my previous post also appears in there (page 23). Both of them are clearly labelled as to what they show. Labels they chose not to show in their video.
It may have been scanned in 2002, but it was published in1981. I have an original hard copy. Far from not being mentioned at all, the specific term 'flag crater' is mentioned 22 times.
It's also worth mentioning that 'flag crater' is mentioned in the pre-mission press kit.
Try harder.
(amended for typos and additional info).
That's a lie, and I'm just pointing it out.
The document they fail to identify is this one:
https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1048/report.pdf
Page 28. It is absolutely the one they quote. The annotated map I identified as being from the PSR in my previous post also appears in there (page 23). Both of them are clearly labelled as to what they show. Labels they chose not to show in their video.
It may have been scanned in 2002, but it was published in1981. I have an original hard copy. Far from not being mentioned at all, the specific term 'flag crater' is mentioned 22 times.
It's also worth mentioning that 'flag crater' is mentioned in the pre-mission press kit.
Try harder.
(amended for typos and additional info).

Recent Posts