Recent Posts

51

The Hoax Theory / Re: AI making debunking harder...

« Last post by Dalhousie on December 27, 2025, 04:11:41 AM »

I'm frustrated by the number of apparently genuine lunar surface images I am seeing, but with the Earth inserted, presumably for aesthetic reasons.  How are we to respond to these? 

52

The Reality of Apollo / Re: Book Review/New Book!!

« Last post by TimberWolfAu on December 27, 2025, 03:53:58 AM »

Santa rolled around, new book time!

Virtual LM, from Scott P Sullivan. (with the CD)

Saw this one, and the Virtual Apollo, and since this one was the cheapest to grab, I grabbed it. Looks good, so I'm going to have to go and grab Virtual Apollo now

53

The Reality of Apollo / Re: Apollo sites photographed by lunar probes - my new page

« Last post by TimberWolfAu on December 27, 2025, 03:44:05 AM »

Awesome sauce.

I have a copy of "The Moon as Viewed by Lunar Orbiter" (nice big green book), which has the reference charts at the end. From looking a quick looks at the links provided, I should be able to find a spot in the book, grab the corresponding frame #, and find it through the links.

54

The Hoax Theory / Re: AI making debunking harder...

« Last post by TimberWolfAu on December 27, 2025, 03:36:38 AM »

Heh, social experiment completed. It took less then 12 hours for our dear Mr White to cry on the Facebook group that I was talking about him, and his crying at click-bait Facebook groups. I mean, these same groups go on about people who have seen UFO's/alien's or how "NASA confirms the existence of UFO's", hardly what I'd consider a reliable source for anything, regardless of the actual facts of them matter.

I'll admit, I was expecting a few days, not less than one day.

55

The Reality of Apollo / Re: Apollo sites photographed by lunar probes - my new page

« Last post by onebigmonkey on December 26, 2025, 09:17:28 AM »

Oooo, new updated page/s? I'll have to have a poke around.

I was planning on using something like this as evidence for a debate, against our favourite 'not-a-doctor', but he never responded, so I didn't go ahead an make anything. Maybe I'll just make up a nice presentation anyway, that I might use later. One part of it was to find a current image of the LO photo I have.

You can find the rescanned versions here

https://planetarydata.jpl.nasa.gov/img/data/lo/LO_1001/DATA/

but you'll need Photoshop (or similar) to load the file format.

Lower res versions can be downloaded here

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/#browse




https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/#browse

56

The Hoax Theory / Re: AI making debunking harder...

« Last post by TimberWolfAu on December 26, 2025, 07:58:57 AM »

On the subject of AI pictures, I'm having a chuckle at Mr White's 'raging' against click-bait Facebook pages that use AI pictures, but say it's a photo from Apollo, or Chandrayaan etc

You'd think he'd be a bit more sympathetic after his own attempts at selling AI 'art'.

57

The Reality of Apollo / Re: Apollo sites photographed by lunar probes - my new page

« Last post by TimberWolfAu on December 26, 2025, 07:47:33 AM »

Oooo, new updated page/s? I'll have to have a poke around.

I was planning on using something like this as evidence for a debate, against our favourite 'not-a-doctor', but he never responded, so I didn't go ahead an make anything. Maybe I'll just make up a nice presentation anyway, that I might use later. One part of it was to find a current image of the LO photo I have.

58

The Reality of Apollo / Re: Apollo sites photographed by lunar probes - my new page

« Last post by Bryanpoprobson on December 24, 2025, 06:54:22 PM »

Top stuff as always..

59

The Reality of Apollo / Apollo sites photographed by lunar probes - my new page

« Last post by onebigmonkey on December 24, 2025, 11:30:33 AM »

Some of you will have seen a page on my site where I've matched details in Apollo photography and other imagery with views taken by orbital probes. As new probes launched and new evidence became available, those pages got more and more cluttered and difficult to edit.

I've now added this page:

https://onebigmonkey.com/apollo/probed/probed.html

Which is no frills presentation of the images available.

Hope it proves useful!

60

The Hoax Theory / Re: Lunar surface models

« Last post by AtomicDog on December 20, 2025, 06:18:50 PM »

As I've said before, WHY would NASA proudly show the "props" that they used to fake the landings with?