The wording of the article rather blows a hole in Blunder's argument that remote sensing and the discovery of soils with a different composition to the Apollo samples proves the Apollo samples are fake. As if the Moon should show no geological variation. 
Jarrah got very excited about Chang'e 3's initial uncalibrated soil spectroscopy which showed a high titanium reading. He seemed unaware that Chang'e 3 missed its intended landing site in the Sinus Iridium (Bay of Rainbows) and landed in the main body of the Mare Imbrium where there are distinct areas of differing titanium concentrations. The actual landing site is in an area of higher titanium concentration, whereas the Bay of Rainbows shows a lower titanium reading - so Jarrah's claim that the Chang'e 3 soil analysis casts doubt on Apollo geology is unfounded. The various differing geologic areas in the Mare Imbrium were identified and mapped by the Clementine mission - so Jarrah of course has claimed that data is fake too.
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/CosmoSparks/Dec13/mare-basalts-Change-3.htmlIt's also worth mentioning that Jarrah has blatantly avoided, when challenged, actually admitting that the Chang'e 3 mission even landed on the Moon (he has previously claimed that China is faking its manned space program in a swimming pool). So Jarrah is claiming that Chang'e 3 scientific data contradicts Apollo while simultaneously prevaricating about the authenticity of Chang'e 3 itself. Of course if he does admit that Chang'e 3 is on the Moon then he'll need to explain why his hero Kaysing was so wrong about the photographic visibility of stars and the effect of a lander's descent engine on the lunar surface. Other aspects of the moon hoax theory are busted by the Yutu rover's sharp rover tracks in the lunar surface, and the clear shadow-side visibility of the lander itself. Jarrah has studiously avoided answering such questions.
In summary: Jarrah claims that 1. Apollo geology is fake 2. Clementine data is fake 3. Chang'e 3 uncalibrated data is genuine but the mission itself might be fake. And he didn't even know where Chang'e 3 had actually landed, so his claims about titanium soil concentrations are irrelevant and do not in any case contradict Apollo.
