Van Allen on Space Radiation.

[Luke Pemberton]

Of course. Remember, NASA can do ANYTHING.
Except put a man on the moon.

An elegant point made about the fantastical story that the CTs want us to believe.

[bknight]

Of course. Remember, NASA can do ANYTHING.
Except put a man on the moon.

An elegant point made about the fantastical story that the CTs want us to believe.

You know it might be nice for NASA to include some higher resolution cameras on the EM-2 mission, taking some better images of the landing sites.  That may stop a few of the nonsense views.

[Ranb]

Not when they will claim that the equipment seen was flown to the moon decades later.

[Willoughby]

Not when they will claim that the equipment seen was flown to the moon decades later.

I think most of them would just reject the photographs.  There are well over ten thousand outstanding quality photographs of just about every single piece of equipment left on the moon taken from mere feet away from right there on the surface.  Thousands of pictures.  There will very likely never be a better quality photograph taken of any of the Apollo remnants than any one of the thousands that already exist,  and these photographs are dismissed as fakes on no basis other than it contradicts their conclusions that the missions were faked.  Their axiom is their conclusion that it was faked.  Any and all information is compared against that, and if it contradicts it, then it necessarily must be fake.  There is no reason to expect them to not use the same logic to dismiss a few more pictures that will be inferior to the thousands that already exist.

[bknight]

Not when they will claim that the equipment seen was flown to the moon decades later.

When was not the issue I referred, but where what.  The LRO images proved the missions were accomplished, yet the hoaxers claimed Photoshop, starting with hunchbacked IIRC.  These images broadcast live would be harder to claim fakery, not ruling the claim out completely.

[Luke Pemberton]

The only proof they will accept is if one of their own fly to moon, survive the deadly sea of radiation and affirm the presence of the hardware. We know that, as one of them is trying to raise money to fly themselves to the moon to provide the definitive and final proof of the landings' authenticity.

Even then, there will be those that claim the arbitrators of truth have been bought by NASA, as everyone has their price.

[bknight]

The only proof they will accept is if one of their own fly to moon, survive the deadly sea of radiation and affirm the presence of the hardware. We know that, as one of them is trying to raise money to fly themselves to the moon to provide the definitive and final proof of the landings' authenticity.

Even then, there will be those that claim the arbitrators of truth have been bought by NASA, as everyone has their price.

Like he is going to get sufficient funds to ride a rocket.  He has the personality skills of a slug.

[onebigmonkey]

Not when they will claim that the equipment seen was flown to the moon decades later.

Apollo hardware was spotted from orbit during the missions, as well as of activity over the duration of the missions, but obviously NASA, evil bad guys, etc etc..

http://onebigmonkey.com/apollo/pancam/pancam.html

[bknight]

obm, you are absolutely amazing, I visited your web page and looked at the panoramic images and I can't find the LM(s) except where you have zoomed in quite tight.

[ineluki]

The only proof they will accept is if one of their own fly to moon, survive the deadly sea of radiation and affirm the presence of the hardware.

I doubt any of the leftover Hoaxpreachers would ever admit that they were wrong for years.

Pick one or more of the following

[ ] the one who made the trip was bribed or threatened to lie (as you already noted)
[ ] the one who made the trip was hypnotized or fooled in some other way (can even be used by the one who made the trip)
[ ] it works now but not then
[ ] the relics were brought were later
[ ] the NASA was using secret technology (Area51 ... UFO....)

[bknight]

The only proof they will accept is if one of their own fly to moon, survive the deadly sea of radiation and affirm the presence of the hardware.

I doubt any of the leftover Hoaxpreachers would ever admit that they were wrong for years.

Pick one or more of the following

[ ] the one who made the trip was bribed or threatened to lie (as you already noted)
[ ] the one who made the trip was hypnotized or fooled in some other way (can even be used by the one who made the trip)
[ ] it works now but not then
[ ] the relics were brought were later
[ ] the NASA was using secret technology (Area51 ... UFO....)

All of the above.