No. No, that's wrong. If you support him, you are supporting someone also supported by the KKK and Nazis. That's not saying you yourself are either, it's just saying that you are willing to side with them. And if you are . . . .
Does ANYONE else see the OBVIOUS false analogy AND contradictory message here?
I'm not sure what the contradictory message is here, but the "logic" used is discussed here,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacyunder "Guilt by association as an ad hominem fallacy".
I found some statements by Gillianren that are rather complimentary of Hillary Clinton. If we assume that she voted for Clinton, then she is "willing to side with them", "them" being the other 65,841,141 Clinton voters. But Gillianren is not responsible for the beliefs and actions of those 65,841,141 people; she is responsible for her own. Similarly, a Trump voter is not responsible for what the 62,976,216 other Trump voters believe or do; s/he is responsible for his/her own beliefs and actions.
If supporting Trump (or Clinton, or anyone else for that matter) is objectively a bad thing, then one should be able to show that without examining the moral qualities of other people who support Trump (or Clinton or whomever).
For what it's worth, I'm going to make myself really popular by quoting one of your earlier statements, that seems to have kicked off this whole flurry:
However, during the course of his presidency I have noted a constant concerted effort to find flaws in everything he does, manufacture them where they don't exist, shout it all out to the world, and, if not outright defiant in the face of facts, remain utterly silent when such claims come up empty or are proven false.
I happen to agree with that, although I find it quite unremarkable; it is true of every US president (and major party presidential candidate) for as long as I can remember. I've seen criticisms of Trump (and Obama, and Bush Jr, and W Clinton, etc.) that are just plain goofy. I've seen supporters (and opponents) of each of these presidents act in a highly hypocritical fashion, shrieking with outrage when X does something, but becoming strangely quiet when Y does the same thing. Etc.
Why anyone would find your observation in the least bit objectionable is beyond me. The sentiment "I don't like Trump" (substitute anyone else you like) does not require one to reach the conclusion "every criticism of Trump is a valid one", or "no critic of Trump is ever hypocritical". Furthermore, arguing that some criticisms of Trump are invalid, or that some critics of Trump are hypocritical, does not make one a Trump supporter. And yet internet logic frequently comes up short of real logic
![Sad :(](http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/Smileys/default/sad.gif)