I believe
This is representative of most of your "arguments". You say things like, "it seems...", "I would expect...", "this should...".
You're not actually making any arguments. You're stating a conclusion based on your inferences, suppositions, and ignorance, and expecting that if no one can demonstrate to your satisfaction that you're mistaken that your conclusion stands.
The fact is, however, you are not the gatekeeper of what is true, and nothing needs to be proven to your satisfaction. If you were intellectually honest you would see discrepancies in this minutiae you've found (or more accurately, had fed to you), assume you are mistaken and exert all of your efforts to understanding why. If you fail to find the reason or reasons, you might then seek help from others to help you see what you're missing. Not from the perspective of someone who believes that Apollo is a hoax, but from someone who is trying to understand why the facts of a situation don't match their expectations. And even then, if you and all of the people you get to help you, fail to find the cause of your misunderstanding, none of these minutiae can ever disprove the truth about the Apollo landings. The best they can do is serve as a catalyst to find actual evidence of a fraud.
The money spent on the machines to execute the moon landings is documented in transparent government budget lines. Any money spent on a hoax would, by necessity, not be documented. Where did that money come from? Who paid for it? How did they hide it from people whose jobs are to make sure money can't be misappropriated?
The rockets all launched. If not the moon, where did they go? Obviously the rockets worked, so if your claim is that they went to the moon and didn't land, what actual facts demonstrate the incapability of the LM from successfully landing? If they went to the moon with a lander that
could land, then why did they elect not to?
If you believe they stayed in orbit, why was Apollo 13 observed in lunar transit by amateur astronomers?
Most importantly, if this was all staged, there is a location on Earth where it was filmed and many people who worked at that location to film it. Where was the studio, who worked on it, how did they keep all of this a secret, and why has no one revealed what they did?
You've made it quite clear that no evidence will be convincing to you. Anything from NASA is obviously biased, doctored, or otherwise faked, but anything that isn't from NASA is unofficial and without credibility. The burden is on you to prove your claims. You can't just state it's a hoax and then simply dismiss evidence to the contrary and claim victory. If you believe Apollo was faked then prove it. If you can't, then admit it, and humbly ask for help with the things you're having trouble understanding.
PS - any evidence of high intellect that you may or may not actually possess doesn't make you immune to the Dunning-Kruger effect. It is simply a situation in which the person is unaware of what they don't know, so it is possible that if you are very intelligent, your arrogance is blinding you to the giant gaps in your understanding. It is always more likely that an individual is mistaken is their conclusion is at odds with hundreds of thousands of experts and decades of recorded history. While it is possible the individual is correct (see Copernicus or Galileo), one should always assume they are wrong and work with that hypothesis to exhaustion. You have definitely failed to meet that standard. Please do better.
