Author Topic: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam  (Read 161807 times)

Offline Echnaton

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1490
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #195 on: January 10, 2013, 05:30:38 PM »
I’m not some kind of hoax fanatic, and I’m willing to accept defeat if proven wrong....

Perhaps during your hiatus,you can also learn the concept of burden of proof.  That is you need to prove you are right, not arrogantly declare yourself to be right based on some crank website and demand others prove you wrong.   A hoax? Your claim, your proof. 
The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new. —Samuel Beckett

Offline Jason Thompson

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1601
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #196 on: January 10, 2013, 05:40:41 PM »
One looks like a proper module and the other one is shabby and has Scotch tape all over the place.  You have not proven anything to me.

It is impossible to prove anything to someone who does not actually read and understand the replies given. Since you insist on referring to it as 'scotch tape' despite many people telling you it is nothing of the kind, we can reasonably assume your promised' research' will be very limited in scope and you will return having not been convinced at all.

Quote
I will be using some of Jack White’s findings but I will look into them carefully and taking into account the laws of physics, unchangeable wherever you are in this reality, even on the moon.

But useless if you lack the framework to apply them.

Quote
As I said before, I won't be coming back until I have researched the Apollo missions properlly, so don't keep on saying why I'm not back.
It could take a few weeks or months, because I'm busy during the day with my family and my job.

If you're researching it 'properly' it will take longer than that. I've been doing it for a decade and still have stuff I don't know.
"There's this idea that everyone's opinion is equally valid. My arse! Bloke who was a professor of dentistry for forty years does NOT have a debate with some eejit who removes his teeth with string and a door!"  - Dara O'Briain

Offline Zakalwe

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1598
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #197 on: January 10, 2013, 05:59:12 PM »
I’m not some kind of hoax fanatic,

The same as a lot of other HBs...you lack the intellectual capacity, education and experience to understand what you mock, and haven't the cojones to admit it. Or to even admit that you ARE a hoax believer and fanatic. Why else would you dedicate hours of your life to creating a conspiracy theory website with plagiarised material???


I will be using some of Jack White’s findings but I will look into them carefully and taking into account the laws of physics, unchangeable wherever you are in this reality, even on the moon.
And you are qualified or even knowledgeable in the laws of physics???

I will be not coming back to the forum, until I have everything I have collected in another internet page, and as I said before, I’m willing to change my mind if proven wrong.
No you're not (so far anyway). You've taken the cowards approach of not even acknowledging the responses that you have received from people that are experts in the field. Rather, you will slink away, no doubt to continue to delude yourself. I'm sorry, but your approach smacks of intellectual cowardice.

You have not proven anything to me yet, even if you posted that beautiful picture of the satellite but that proves nothing.
Its not for anyone to prove you wrong. When did it become anyone's job to prove every nutjob on the Internet that they are wrong??? Learn about the burden of proof (though I bet you won't). You are the one making the extraordinary claims therefore you carry the burden of proof. Its as simple as that.


Anyway, the runway is yours. You're cleared for take-off....

"The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.' " - Isaac Asimov

Offline Glom

  • Saturn
  • ****
  • Posts: 1102
Re: Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #198 on: January 10, 2013, 05:59:25 PM »
I have just come back from my job.
That picture that you posted is beautiful and it really looks like whatever it's supposed to be.  A satellite?

But the two pictures I posted of the lunar module are absolutely different.
One looks like a proper module and the other one is shabby and has Scotch tape all over the place.  You have not proven anything to me.

Anyway I want to tell something to all of you.

I’m not some kind of hoax fanatic, and I’m willing to accept defeat if proven wrong, so I have decided to do a proper investigation into everything to do with the Apollo missions to the moon.

I will be using some of Jack White’s findings but I will look into them carefully and taking into account the laws of physics, unchangeable wherever you are in this reality, even on the moon.

I will be not coming back to the forum, until I have everything I have collected in another internet page, and as I said before, I’m willing to change my mind if proven wrong.

You have not proven anything to me yet, even if you posted that beautiful picture of the satellite but that proves nothing.

As I said before, I won't be coming back until I have researched the Apollo missions properlly, so don't keep on saying why I'm not back.
It could take a few weeks or months, because I'm busy during the day with my family and my job.

So bye for the moment

You're going to research this? Haven't you already researched this?

You created a website making audacious claims. Surely research went into that. I don't expect people to make public audacious claims without doing research first.

Offline Inanimate Carbon Rod

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 271
    • evilscience
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #199 on: January 10, 2013, 06:11:21 PM »
I will be using some of Jack White’s findings.

Jack White’s findings.

Jack White’s findings.

Jack White’s findings.

Dear Lord!

 :o
Formerly Supermeerkat. Like you care.

Offline nomuse

  • Jupiter
  • ***
  • Posts: 859
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #200 on: January 10, 2013, 06:24:11 PM »
I have just come back from my job.
That picture that you posted is beautiful and it really looks like whatever it's supposed to be.  A satellite?

But the two pictures I posted of the lunar module are absolutely different.
One looks like a proper module and the other one is shabby and has Scotch tape all over the place.  You have not proven anything to me.

Anyway I want to tell something to all of you.

I’m not some kind of hoax fanatic, and I’m willing to accept defeat if proven wrong, so I have decided to do a proper investigation into everything to do with the Apollo missions to the moon.

I will be using some of Jack White’s findings but I will look into them carefully and taking into account the laws of physics, unchangeable wherever you are in this reality, even on the moon.

I will be not coming back to the forum, until I have everything I have collected in another internet page, and as I said before, I’m willing to change my mind if proven wrong.

You have not proven anything to me yet, even if you posted that beautiful picture of the satellite but that proves nothing.

As I said before, I won't be coming back until I have researched the Apollo missions properlly, so don't keep on saying why I'm not back.
It could take a few weeks or months, because I'm busy during the day with my family and my job.

So bye for the moment

Good idea, but even better, look at Jack Whites "studies" taking into account GEOMETRY.  Your kids could probably help with this.

Offline Andromeda

  • Jupiter
  • ***
  • Posts: 746
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #201 on: January 10, 2013, 06:25:16 PM »
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'" - Isaac Asimov.

Offline frenat

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 460
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #202 on: January 10, 2013, 06:32:35 PM »
It looks like one of those things my children make in the school but my kids would make it much better.  It is obvious where the Scotch tape has been added and it is obvious that is a blue paper.
It is golden Scotch tape and blue paper and it seems to have been stiched in some places.
Those metal rods are kept in place by the tape.
I can even ask my kids to do something like this and post the results on facebook
What is obvious is you are not an aerospace engineer and you have no idea what you are talking about.
-Reality is not determined by your lack of comprehension.
 -Never let facts stand in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
 -There are no bad ideas, just great ideas that go horribly wrong.

Offline frenat

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 460
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #203 on: January 10, 2013, 06:47:58 PM »
It looks shabbily made, like some of the things my children make for their school homework.

Here is another picture of the module

http://strangeapollo2.blogspot.co.uk/

In one picture it looks fine, but it the other picture looks strange

I'll be back later.  I have to feed my family

Jack White, whose crap you've seemed to swallow without looking at any of it critically, has taken a low res, picture taken from farther away and deceptively cropped it for the pic on the left.  The lighting is also different. 

What have you done to verify the accuracy of White's supposed analyses?  From whom did you obtain permission to repost his stuff?  Why have you not acknowledged his copyright on your badly written page?

Is it impossible for you to respond to the comments you're getting?  Ignoring them as you have been is rude and will likely end up getting you banned.
-Reality is not determined by your lack of comprehension.
 -Never let facts stand in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
 -There are no bad ideas, just great ideas that go horribly wrong.

Offline frenat

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 460
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #204 on: January 10, 2013, 06:48:51 PM »

As I said before, I won't be coming back until I have researched the Apollo missions properlly, so don't keep on saying why I'm not back.
It could take a few weeks or months, because I'm busy during the day with my family and my job.

So bye for the moment

You're unable to discuss the multiple things you've already brought up without having more crap to fling at the wall?   ???
-Reality is not determined by your lack of comprehension.
 -Never let facts stand in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
 -There are no bad ideas, just great ideas that go horribly wrong.

Offline Nowhere Man

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #205 on: January 10, 2013, 07:50:58 PM »
Anybody want to know the exact external surfaces on LM-5 (Eagle, Apollo 11's LM)? Here you go:

http://home.earthlink.net/~pfjeld/lmdata/index.html
Great googly moogly.  That's the kind of thing I'll need when I get 'round to working on the LM models I have in the queue (Revell's 1:96 Apollo/Saturn and Revell's 1:100 LM).  Thanks!  ;D

Fred
Hey, you!  "It's" with an apostrophe means "it is" or "it has."  "Its" without an apostrophe means "belongs to it."

"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684

Offline Halcyon Dayz, FCD

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Contrarian's Contrarian
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #206 on: January 10, 2013, 09:14:31 PM »
It looks shabbily made, like some of the things my children make for their school homework.
I've seen clouds that look like castles.
Proof of anti-gravity?

Pray tell,
You must have spend quite a lot of time on YouTube and Apollo Hoax promoting sites "studying" the Hoax "Theory".
You also must have spend quite a lot of time on making your very own  Apollo Hoax promoting site.
Couldn't you have spared a few hour to research Apollo itself?
Actually, shouldn't you have done that before concluding that Apollo was hoaxed?

If you'd gone to an astronautics forum, or the NASA site, and had just asked: "What am I looking at?" people would have been happy to explain.

There's no air in space.
So air cooling won't work.
The trick is not to get hot in the first place.
You use a parasol to keep the sunlight away from you.
The "space blankets" are that parasol, they keep the sunlight away from the spacecraft itself.

You also might want to learn what a Whipple Shield is.

I’m not some kind of hoax fanatic, and I’m willing to accept defeat if proven wrong,
Uh, uh.

YOU have libellously accused (at least) thousands of criminal conduct.
YOU need to proof your claim or retract it.

so I have decided to do a proper investigation into everything to do with the Apollo missions to the moon.
As I said, you should have done that before accusing thousands of criminal conduct.

So how many more Hoax sites are you going to "study", and how many more real Apollo documents are you going to ignore?


I don't expect people to make public audacious claims without doing research first.
But than you are a rational and moral person.
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.

Offline ka9q

  • Neptune
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #207 on: January 10, 2013, 09:22:58 PM »
One looks like a proper module and the other one is shabby and has Scotch tape all over the place.  You have not proven anything to me.
"Scotch" tape (Cellophane) is processed cellulose (plant fiber). Kapton is a polyimide plastic. They have vastly different physical properties:

1. Kapton is far stronger than Cellophane.
2. Kapton can withstand a huge temperature range: −273 to +400 °C. I don't know the range for Cellophane, but I suspect it's a lot narrower.
3. Kapton is orange; Cellophane is clear.
4. Kapton is more expensive than Cellophane.
5. I'm sure there are others.

Because of Kapton's cost and that it's exceptional physical properties aren't terribly useful to the general public, they are unlikely to be familiar with it. I've got several rolls of it in a drawer, and it has occurred to me to do a little Youtube video showing the differences between it and ordinary "Scotch" (Cellophane) tape. Just pouring some molten solder onto a sample of each should make a good point. If I can find some liquid nitrogen, that would help too.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2013, 09:33:09 PM by ka9q »

Offline nomuse

  • Jupiter
  • ***
  • Posts: 859
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #208 on: January 10, 2013, 10:14:01 PM »
I use scotch tape for soldering.  Well...to hold parts to perf whilst I'm soldering them down!  From what I can tell it has about the same ability to withstand contact with hot metal as my own fingers do.

Offline sts60

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 402
Re: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Scam
« Reply #209 on: January 10, 2013, 10:58:58 PM »
I have just come back from my job.
Same here.  I design, analyze, build, and operate spacecraft and space and ground systems for a living.  How about you?

That picture that you posted is beautiful and it really looks like whatever it's supposed to be.  A satellite?

But the two pictures I posted of the lunar module are absolutely different.
Well, you posted pictures of both the Lunar Module and the Command/Service Module.  They are two different spacecraft, and thus one might well expect them to look, you know, different.  But you've also posted - well, plagiarized -  an illustration showing an inability to recognize that a ladder will look different when viewed from the side, so...

One looks like a proper module and the other one is shabby and has Scotch tape all over the place.  You have not proven anything to me.
No.  We've proven that one uses various standard aerospace materials - not Scotch tape - as part of its exterior thermal insulation.  We provided detailed references and shown examples from other spacecraft.  Some of us have cited direct personal experience with said materials.  I have personally applied Kapton adhesive to spacecraft; it is not Scotch tape.   I don't understand why you cannot or will not grasp such well-documented facts, but the proof you have been provided would stand up in any engineering review board.  Or a Congressional review panel, or a court of law.

It's proof, alright, even if you pretend it hasn't been provided to you.

You, on the other hand, have proven that you can't tell the difference between the spacecraft that landed men on the Moon, and the spacecraft that returned them to Earth; the latter designed to operate in a pure vacuum environment, the former designed to reenter Earth's atmosphere at many thousands of miles per hour.  Not even the famously incompetent Jack White made that mistake.  What does that tell you?

Anyway I want to tell something to all of you.

I’m not some kind of hoax fanatic, and I’m willing to accept defeat if proven wrong, so I have decided to do a proper investigation into everything to do with the Apollo missions to the moon.
I'm glad you've decided to start learning about Apollo.  We've provided you a number of references, and are willing to help you with any questions.  But it's not a question of "defeat" (or "victory") for that matter.  This isn't a political debate.  We're here to teach and to learn.

I might also point out that everything to do with the Apollo missions to the Moon is a very, very tall order indeed.  The Apollo record is much broader and deeper than you imagine.   It's not just a few dozen photographs and a couple of hours of video.  It's tens of thousands of still images, hundreds of hours of motion imagery, thousands of tons of flight, ground, and test hardware, tens of thousands of pages of design studies, status reports, Congressional panel publications, engineering analyses, test reports, operations manuals, engineering drawings of all sizes, experience reports, and countless scientific papers.  It's the personal testimony of some of the four hundred thousand people, civil servants and contractors alike, who designed, built, tested, flew, and studied Apollo.  It's the engineering, scientific, and programmatic lessons incorporated into standard aerospace practice and planetary science today.  It's thirty gigabits of telemetry from nuclear-powered robotic laboratories deployed by the Apollo crews that operated up to eight years on the Moon.   It's been public record from the start, but a staggering amount of the documentation has been digitized and placed on the NASA Technical Reports Server and other sites; there is more information freely downloadable than you would ever be able to read, in incredible detail.  And there's more on paper at contractors and collectors and government archives that's not on the Internet.

So you'll never investigate everything to do with Apollo.  But you can get a good general overview, and start in one or a few key areas in more detail.  If you'd like suggestions, we'll provide them.

I will be using some of Jack White’s findings but I will look into them carefully and taking into account the laws of physics, unchangeable wherever you are in this reality, even on the moon.
That's terrific; my undergraduate degree was in space physics.  Physics is why the LM's thermal and micrometeoroid layers (the wrinkly ones over the aluminum hull) look the way they do, not sleek and Hollywood-ish.

But using Jack White's findings is a pretty poor way to start; as stated, he was a very poor observer and quite ignorant of the Apollo record, plus he tended to deliberately distort his presentations to create "anomalies".  Why don't you go to reputable sources first?
I will be not coming back to the forum, until I have everything I have collected in another internet page, .
OK, but what will you collect?  So far, all you've done is plagiarize and echo the work of one seriously clueless crank.  Willl you look at actual documentation of the missions?  Will you talk to actual experts?  Or will you just make the rounds of other conspiracist sites?

and as I said before, I’m willing to change my mind if proven wrong
Frankly, it's hard to believe you when you say this.   For example:

You have not proven anything to me yet, even if you posted that beautiful picture of the satellite but that proves nothing.
You say you are willing to change your mind, but you keep on repeating idiot cliches like "Scotch tape and cardboard" when abosolutely explict information to the contrary is handed to you on a silver platter by genuine experts.  In fact, you act as if it never happened.  So it's hard to take your protestations of open-mindedness seriously with your track record.  But I am willing to be pleasantly surprised.

As I said before, I won't be coming back until I have researched the Apollo missions properlly, so don't keep on saying why I'm not back.
It could take a few weeks or months, because I'm busy during the day with my family and my job.

So bye for the moment
We have our families and jobs too, but again, I think I speak for the forum regulars that we'll gladly help you if you decide you wish to learn about Apollo in particular and space flight in general.